2003
DOI: 10.1038/sj.eye.6700485
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Repeatability and reproducibility of the BVI ultrasonic Pachymeter

Abstract: Purpose To evaluate the interobserver and intraobserver reliability of a commercially available, portable, ultrasonic pachymeter. Methods For the interobserver variability study, 42 healthy subjects underwent repeated ultrasonic pachymetry under topical anaesthesia performed by two observers. For the intraobserver study, another 30 further healthy subjects underwent repeated pachymetry by one of the observers. Agreement was analysed by means of Bland-Altman plots and by determination of the intraclass correlat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The reproducibility of the BV pachymeter is excellent, with a coefficient of variation of less than 0.2% for repeated measurements. 14 Pneumotonometry has advantages compared with most other tonometry systems. It uses a noncontact, observer-independent measuring principle.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reproducibility of the BV pachymeter is excellent, with a coefficient of variation of less than 0.2% for repeated measurements. 14 Pneumotonometry has advantages compared with most other tonometry systems. It uses a noncontact, observer-independent measuring principle.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ten measurements were performed in rapid succession and the lowest reading was recorded as the corneal thickness. Repeatable and reliable measurements of corneal thickness have been demonstrated using this technique …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Measurements performed in this fashion are reported to be repeatable and reproducible. 27 All CCT measurements were performed by one operator (PG).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%