2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.jevs.2016.07.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Repeatability and Reliability of Heart Rate Variability in Healthy, Adult Pony Mares

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
(78 reference statements)
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Resting heart rate variability (HRV) has been well described in horses . However, during exercise, publications documenting the normal R‐R variation are limited .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Resting heart rate variability (HRV) has been well described in horses . However, during exercise, publications documenting the normal R‐R variation are limited .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Eggensperger (Eggensperger and Schwarzwald 2017) measured time-domain HRV variables on three consecutive days in five horses, for record-ing lengths of ten minutes to ten hours and found the lowest variability of the reported parameters in the ten-hour recordings. Van Vollenhoven (van Vollenhoven et al 2016) reported on the day to day reliability of HRV parameters in pony mares at pasture and in stalls, but we were of the opinion that method ological issues in this study limited its contribution to the understanding of HRV reliability.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…The Televet data were manually corrected using Televet software version 6.0.0 before RR-intervals being exported. All raw IBI were then imported into the software (Kubios HRV, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio Finland) for HRV parameter analysis after applying the strong correction filter ( 34 ). The following HRV parameters were used: time-domain parameters including standard deviation of the successive R–R intervals (SDNN) and root mean square of the successive differences (RMSSD) ( 5 , 10 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%