2016
DOI: 10.14740/jocmr2312w
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Repeatability and Diagnostic Value of Nasal Potential Difference in a Genetically Admixed Population

Abstract: BackgroundThe genetic diversity of the Brazilian population results from three ethnic groups admixture: Europeans, Africans and Amerindians, thus increasing the difficulty of performing cystic fibrosis (CF) diagnosis. The nasal potential difference (NPD) evaluates the cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) and epithelial sodium channel (ENaC) activity. Despite being a useful CF diagnostic test and a biomarker of CFTR-modulator drugs, it is also highly operator dependent. Therefore, it may b… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 37 publications
(105 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several other CFTR biomarkers have potential to serve as an individual monitoring tool of CFTR activity, but are less well suited for large scale application. Nasal potential difference (NPD) has also been established as a clinical biomarker in multiple studies, but the expertise involved limit its utility for wide‐spread utilization for monitoring. Other assays, such as CFTR Western blot, mRNA expression, flow cytometry to quantify cell surface expression of either CFTR in monocytes (#60) or alterations in non‐CFTR membrane proteins in peripheral blood leukocytes (#298) all have potential utility, particularly in the clinical trial setting, but like NPD, need improvements for widespread application on a population basis or to determine individual response.…”
Section: Clinical Biomarkers Of Cftr Activitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several other CFTR biomarkers have potential to serve as an individual monitoring tool of CFTR activity, but are less well suited for large scale application. Nasal potential difference (NPD) has also been established as a clinical biomarker in multiple studies, but the expertise involved limit its utility for wide‐spread utilization for monitoring. Other assays, such as CFTR Western blot, mRNA expression, flow cytometry to quantify cell surface expression of either CFTR in monocytes (#60) or alterations in non‐CFTR membrane proteins in peripheral blood leukocytes (#298) all have potential utility, particularly in the clinical trial setting, but like NPD, need improvements for widespread application on a population basis or to determine individual response.…”
Section: Clinical Biomarkers Of Cftr Activitymentioning
confidence: 99%