2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.oftale.2022.04.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Repeatability and comparability of a new swept-source optical coherence tomographer in optical biometry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

2
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
2
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The consistency of AL, CCT and ACD measures obtained for the new optical biometer evaluated was excellent in the sample of healthy eyes evaluated, with Sw of 0.004 mm, 4.394 µm, and 0.017 mm, respectively. These Sw values were similar to those reported for the anatomical measures obtained with PCI, SS-OCT, optical low-coherence reflectometry (OLCR), and Scheimpflug camera-based biometers [4,[14][15][16][17][18]. Hashemi et al [14] reported Sw values of 0.02 mm and 0.02 mm for AL and ACD measurements, respectively, obtained with an instrument consisting of a dual rotating Scheimpflug camera, a Placido disk topographer, and an optical coherence tomography-based A-scan.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…The consistency of AL, CCT and ACD measures obtained for the new optical biometer evaluated was excellent in the sample of healthy eyes evaluated, with Sw of 0.004 mm, 4.394 µm, and 0.017 mm, respectively. These Sw values were similar to those reported for the anatomical measures obtained with PCI, SS-OCT, optical low-coherence reflectometry (OLCR), and Scheimpflug camera-based biometers [4,[14][15][16][17][18]. Hashemi et al [14] reported Sw values of 0.02 mm and 0.02 mm for AL and ACD measurements, respectively, obtained with an instrument consisting of a dual rotating Scheimpflug camera, a Placido disk topographer, and an optical coherence tomography-based A-scan.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…The consistency of AL, CCT, and ACD measures obtained for the new optical biometer evaluated was excellent in the sample of healthy eyes evaluated, with S w of 0.004 mm, 4.394 µm, and 0.017 mm, respectively. These S w values were similar to those reported for the anatomical measures obtained with PCI, SS-OCT, optical low-coherence reflectometry (OLCR), and Scheimpflug camera-based biometers [ 4 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 ]. Hashemi et al [ 14 ] reported S w values of 0.02 mm and 0.02 mm for AL and ACD measurements, respectively, obtained with an instrument consisting of a dual rotating Scheimpflug camera, a Placido disk topographer, and an optical coherence tomography-based A-scan.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…The mean difference between biometers was 0.12 mm, with limits of agreement of 0.03 and 0.21 mm. This difference was statistically significant as well as clinically relevant, considering the trend an overestimation of ACD with the VEMoS-AXL system and that the limits of agreement were in the range of those reported in studies comparing biometers and concluding that ACD measures were not interchangeable [ 5 , 6 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 ]. Moon et al [ 16 ] concluded that ACD measures obtained with Anterion and IOL-Master 500 systems were not interchangeable (limits of agreement, −0.33 to 0.22 mm) as well as ACD measurements obtained with OA-2000 and IOL-Master 500 biometers (limits of agreement, −0.37 to 0.20 mm).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 53%
See 2 more Smart Citations