2009
DOI: 10.1051/vetres/2009062
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Repeat tuberculin skin testing leads to desensitisation in naturally infected tuberculous cattle which is associated with elevated interleukin-10 and decreased interleukin-1 beta responses

Abstract: The principal surveillance tool used to control bovine tuberculosis in cattle is the removal of animals that provide a positive response to the tuberculin skin-test. In this study we performed a longitudinal investigation of the immunological and diagnostic consequences of repeated short-interval skin-tests in cattle naturally infected with Mycobacterium bovis. Tuberculin skin-test positive cattle were subjected to up to four further intradermal comparative cervical skin-tests at approximately 60-day intervals… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
70
2

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 74 publications
(77 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
(48 reference statements)
5
70
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Several studies have shown that the skin test boosts serum antibody responses and consequently increases sensitivity (11)(12)(13)26). In contrast, IFN-␥ production is little affected by skin testing when the SICCT is used (7,9), although IFN-␥ responses have been shown to be boosted following the caudal fold tuberculin test (6,30). Therefore, further studies are needed to assess whether prior skin testing will affect sensitivity.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies have shown that the skin test boosts serum antibody responses and consequently increases sensitivity (11)(12)(13)26). In contrast, IFN-␥ production is little affected by skin testing when the SICCT is used (7,9), although IFN-␥ responses have been shown to be boosted following the caudal fold tuberculin test (6,30). Therefore, further studies are needed to assess whether prior skin testing will affect sensitivity.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Simultaneous detection of IFN-␥, IL-1␤, IL-4, IL-10, IL-12, MIP-1␤, and TNF-␣ was performed as previously described (3). Briefly, multiplex 96-well plates were commercially prespotted (Meso Scale Discovery [MSD], Gaithersburg, MD) with the following capture antibodies: antibovine IFN-␥ (Mabtech, Stockholm, Sweden), anti-bovine IL-4 and TNF-␣ (Endogen, Rockford, IL), anti-bovine IL-10 and IL-12 (AbD Serotec, Oxford, United Kingdom), and anti-bovine IL-1␤ and cross-reactive anti-human MIP-1␤ (MSD).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although, compared to the IFN-␥ test, the IL-2 test was not as sensitive in SICCT-negative animals compared to skin testpositive animals, identifying just 30.3% of all the IFN-␥ ϩ animals, and 37.8% of the IFN-␥ ϩ VL cattle. However, it is possible that future improvement in the sensitivity to detect IL-2, for example using enzyme-linked immunosorbent spot (ELISPOT) assay read-outs (as we are currently investigating in our laboratory [data not shown]) or a more sensitive system, such as Meso Scale Discovery technology (which we already use in our laboratory to detect other low-level cytokines, like IL-10 [22]) to quantify IL-2 in supernatants could enhance its overall test sensitivity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%