2019
DOI: 10.1080/00779954.2019.1612937
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Repeat sales house price indices: comparative properties under alternative data generation processes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In other words, the quality-change issue is not adjusted in the WRS index. Grimes et al (2019) further demonstrated that the WRS index does not necessarily outperform the BMN one. Dorsey et al (2010) contended that the assumption of constant quality in the repeat sales method causes the index to over-estimate during housing booms and busts.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…In other words, the quality-change issue is not adjusted in the WRS index. Grimes et al (2019) further demonstrated that the WRS index does not necessarily outperform the BMN one. Dorsey et al (2010) contended that the assumption of constant quality in the repeat sales method causes the index to over-estimate during housing booms and busts.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Quality-adjusted Hedonic regression [109][110][111][112][113][114] Explicit time variable Strictly cross-sectional Repeat-sales [98,[114][115][116] Original repeat-sales Weighted repeat-sales Hybrid [117][118][119][120] Case and Quigley's Quigley Hill, Knight and Sirman Englund, Quigley and Redfearn Non-quality-adjusted Average [58] M e a n Median…”
Section: Methods Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A study was done in 2021 to compare the three main repeat sales methods in New Zealand by using a dataset from CoreLogic NZ (Grimes et al, 2021). The study compared the original repeat sales method by Bailey (BMN), the Case and Shiller method (CS), and the Gao and Wang (2007) unbalanced panel approach (UP).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The pair transactions dataset was split into a training set of 80% and test set of 20% and stratified by the final sale year to allow for balanced coverage over the years between the training and test sets. The OLS model was fitted (Grimes et al, 2021) using the training set. Using the test set, the model can predict b y; the log of the ratio between the final price and the initial price as follows:…”
Section: Performance Metricsmentioning
confidence: 99%