2014
DOI: 10.1080/10835547.2014.12090375
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Repeat Sales House Price Index Methodology

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this method, matching pairs of sales of the same objects are gathered and used to calculate price differences. One of the assumptions here is that the compared objects are identical (Nagaraja, Brown, & Wachter, 2014). In case of actual sales, the period between two sales of the same object can cover a long range (real estate is usually not a short term purchase).…”
Section: Figure 6 -Stepwise Demarcation Of Real Estate Spe Share Dealsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this method, matching pairs of sales of the same objects are gathered and used to calculate price differences. One of the assumptions here is that the compared objects are identical (Nagaraja, Brown, & Wachter, 2014). In case of actual sales, the period between two sales of the same object can cover a long range (real estate is usually not a short term purchase).…”
Section: Figure 6 -Stepwise Demarcation Of Real Estate Spe Share Dealsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Perhaps the most significant differences are the estimation methods used to construct each index: ZHVI relies on AVMs; whereas S&P C-S and FHFA are constructed from weighted least squares regressions. Overviews of the FHFA and S&P C-S methodologies are presented in Appendices B and C. For a complete overview of HPI methodologies, we refer the reader to Nagaraja et al, 15,16 who chronicle the statistical development of HPIs from the original repeat sales approach of Bailey et al 2 to modern statistical methods of Nagaraja et al 7 Differences in the HPIs are not limited to estimation methods. The underlying data sources differ as well.…”
Section: Comparisonmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The quadratic component was first introduced to the literature by Abraham and Schauman, 30 who explained " … we do not believe that the variance in price of individual properties around the index will increase linearly forever." Nagaraja et al 15 note that this quadratic variance component in the model has statistical implications when a single home transacts more than twice, and it results in an estimate βt that is unbiased but not the minimum variance estimator.…”
Section: Appendix B Fhfamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The advantage of the Case-Shiller method is that it allows for time-weighting of transactions, so we choose this method. There are other approaches to constructing repeat sales price indices Nagaraja, Brown and Wachter (2014). compare five methods and conclude that all indices are adequate.5 Because SAND was introduced in August 2020, transactions prior to SAND's existence are excluded for analyses denominated in SAND.6 DAI is primarily used to mint LAND, so there is little variation left for secondary transactions.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%