1995
DOI: 10.1109/36.377933
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Repeat-pass SAR interferometry over forested terrain

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
97
0
1

Year Published

2000
2000
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 208 publications
(101 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
3
97
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Early results obtained using ERS repeat-pass data by Hagberg, Ulander, and Askne (1995) and Wegmüller and Werner (1995) showed that the interferometric coherence is significantly lower over forest than over open canopies, short vegetation, bare soils and urban areas. Subsequent studies of ERS-1/2 tandem data demonstrated in particular that the one-day repeat pass coherence is useful in land use mapping (Strozzi et al, 2000) and estimation of stem volume in forests (Koskinen, Pulliainen, Hyyppä, Engdahl, & Hallikainen, 2001;Santoro, Askne, Smith, & Fransson, 2002;Smith et al, 1998).…”
Section: Ers and Jers Sar In Forestry Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Early results obtained using ERS repeat-pass data by Hagberg, Ulander, and Askne (1995) and Wegmüller and Werner (1995) showed that the interferometric coherence is significantly lower over forest than over open canopies, short vegetation, bare soils and urban areas. Subsequent studies of ERS-1/2 tandem data demonstrated in particular that the one-day repeat pass coherence is useful in land use mapping (Strozzi et al, 2000) and estimation of stem volume in forests (Koskinen, Pulliainen, Hyyppä, Engdahl, & Hallikainen, 2001;Santoro, Askne, Smith, & Fransson, 2002;Smith et al, 1998).…”
Section: Ers and Jers Sar In Forestry Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, the coherence can be used as an indicator of problems due to layover. This phenomenon is strongly related to the volume-scattering effect discussed in [5] and other articles. Figure4 shows an example of this drop in coherence for the Hirschhorn museum in Washington D. C.…”
Section: From Equation (L)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are three primary types of decorrelation: (a) thermal decorrelation, caused by uncorrelated noise sources within the radar instruments, (b) spatial decorrelation, caused by viewing the target from different locations in space, and (c) temporal decorrelation, typically caused by environmental changes (Henderson and Lewis 1998, Lu et al 2005a,b, Lu et al 2007). The environmental changes that can cause temporal decorrelation include vegetation growth, the erosion/deposition of surface materials, dense vegetation, the presence of ice/snow, winds sufficient to move the vegetation canopy, and the diurnal freezing/thawing and subsequent refreezing of surface materials (Wegmuller 1990, Hagberg et al 1995, Kasischke and Johnstone 2005, Ramsey et al 2006. For very dense forests, a Cband Radarsat-1 system may completely lose coherence over even the shortest observation periods (24 days for Radarsat-1).…”
Section: The Coherence Signalmentioning
confidence: 99%