Abstract:BackgroundInjection drug use (IDU) is a major risk factor for infective endocarditis (IE). Few data exist on repeat IE (rIE) in persons who inject drugs (PWID).MethodsPatients ≥18 years old seen at Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center from 2004 to 2017 who met Duke criteria for IE and who self-reported IDU in the 3 months before admission were identified. The subset of PWID who developed rIE, defined as another episode of IE at least 10 weeks after diagnosis of the first episode, was then reviewed.ResultsOf the … Show more
“…The rate of recurrent endocarditis among PWID in our cohort was 32%, with 68 patients experiencing a second episode. This is higher than rates that have previously been reported in non–drug user populations (which range from 2.4% to 10.9%) [26] but is similar to a cohort of PWID from the 1970s where the recurrence rate was 41% [27] and a more contemporary population in North Carolina where the recurrence rate was 25.3% in PWID [9]. It remains unclear whether any clinical factors increase the likelihood of experiencing a second episode of endocarditis, beyond continued injection drug use.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 62%
“…Interestingly, the risk of recurrent endocarditis in PWID has been inconsistent. It has been shown that repeat endocarditis is associated with injection drug use [9, 25]; however, older studies before the recent opioid crisis did not note an association of recurrent endocarditis with injection drug use [17]. We present the largest case series of recurrent endocarditis among PWID to date.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Recurrence is defined as repeated IE episodes at least 6 months apart or caused by different microorganisms [7, 8]. In the literature, recurrent IE episodes in PWID affect 5.6%–25% of patients [9, 10] and recurrent episodes were reported in 1 small study to be associated with increased morbidity and mortality [9].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Few studies have reported on the microbial etiology and outcomes of recurrent IE episodes [7, 17], likely due to its rarity in most patient populations. Only 1 small study has recently been published on recurrent IE in PWID [9]. Given the current opioid epidemic and its association with IE, there is an urgent need for data on this population.…”
Background
Infective endocarditis (IE) is increasing among persons who inject drugs (PWID) and has high morbidity and mortality. Recurrent IE in PWID is not well described.
Methods
This was a retrospective cohort study conducted between February 2007 and March 2016. It included adult inpatients (≥18) at any of 3 tertiary care centers in London, Ontario, with definite IE based on the Modified Duke's Criteria. The objectives were to characterize recurrent IE in PWID, identify risk factors for recurrent IE, identify the frequency of fungal endocarditis, and establish whether fungal infection was associated with higher mortality.
Results
Three hundred ninety patients had endocarditis, with 212/390 in PWID. Sixty-eight of 212 (32%) PWID had a second episode, with 28/212 (12%) having additional recurrences. Second-episode IE was more common in PWID (11/178 [6.2%] vs 68/212 [32.1%]; P < .001). Peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) line abuse was associated with increased risk of recurrent endocarditis (odds ratio [OR], 1.97; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.01–3.87; P = .04). In PWID, fungal IE was more common in second episodes than first episodes (1/212 [0.5%] vs 5/68 [7.4%]; P = .004). Additionally, fungal infections were associated with mortality in second-episode IE in PWID with an adjusted OR of 16.49 (95% CI, 1.12–243.17; P = .041). Despite recurrent infection, likely due to continued drug use, there was a low rate of referral to addiction treatment (14/68 [20.6%]).
Conclusions
PWID have a high risk of recurrent endocarditis, particularly in patients who abuse PICC lines. Fungal endocarditis is more common in second-episode endocarditis and is associated with increased mortality. Consideration of empiric antifungal therapy in PWID with IE history and suspected IE should be considered.
“…The rate of recurrent endocarditis among PWID in our cohort was 32%, with 68 patients experiencing a second episode. This is higher than rates that have previously been reported in non–drug user populations (which range from 2.4% to 10.9%) [26] but is similar to a cohort of PWID from the 1970s where the recurrence rate was 41% [27] and a more contemporary population in North Carolina where the recurrence rate was 25.3% in PWID [9]. It remains unclear whether any clinical factors increase the likelihood of experiencing a second episode of endocarditis, beyond continued injection drug use.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 62%
“…Interestingly, the risk of recurrent endocarditis in PWID has been inconsistent. It has been shown that repeat endocarditis is associated with injection drug use [9, 25]; however, older studies before the recent opioid crisis did not note an association of recurrent endocarditis with injection drug use [17]. We present the largest case series of recurrent endocarditis among PWID to date.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Recurrence is defined as repeated IE episodes at least 6 months apart or caused by different microorganisms [7, 8]. In the literature, recurrent IE episodes in PWID affect 5.6%–25% of patients [9, 10] and recurrent episodes were reported in 1 small study to be associated with increased morbidity and mortality [9].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Few studies have reported on the microbial etiology and outcomes of recurrent IE episodes [7, 17], likely due to its rarity in most patient populations. Only 1 small study has recently been published on recurrent IE in PWID [9]. Given the current opioid epidemic and its association with IE, there is an urgent need for data on this population.…”
Background
Infective endocarditis (IE) is increasing among persons who inject drugs (PWID) and has high morbidity and mortality. Recurrent IE in PWID is not well described.
Methods
This was a retrospective cohort study conducted between February 2007 and March 2016. It included adult inpatients (≥18) at any of 3 tertiary care centers in London, Ontario, with definite IE based on the Modified Duke's Criteria. The objectives were to characterize recurrent IE in PWID, identify risk factors for recurrent IE, identify the frequency of fungal endocarditis, and establish whether fungal infection was associated with higher mortality.
Results
Three hundred ninety patients had endocarditis, with 212/390 in PWID. Sixty-eight of 212 (32%) PWID had a second episode, with 28/212 (12%) having additional recurrences. Second-episode IE was more common in PWID (11/178 [6.2%] vs 68/212 [32.1%]; P < .001). Peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) line abuse was associated with increased risk of recurrent endocarditis (odds ratio [OR], 1.97; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.01–3.87; P = .04). In PWID, fungal IE was more common in second episodes than first episodes (1/212 [0.5%] vs 5/68 [7.4%]; P = .004). Additionally, fungal infections were associated with mortality in second-episode IE in PWID with an adjusted OR of 16.49 (95% CI, 1.12–243.17; P = .041). Despite recurrent infection, likely due to continued drug use, there was a low rate of referral to addiction treatment (14/68 [20.6%]).
Conclusions
PWID have a high risk of recurrent endocarditis, particularly in patients who abuse PICC lines. Fungal endocarditis is more common in second-episode endocarditis and is associated with increased mortality. Consideration of empiric antifungal therapy in PWID with IE history and suspected IE should be considered.
“…There has been very little data assessing the detailed injection practices associated with developing IE. The literature primarily studies the clinical and epidemiological characteristics of PWID developing IE [3,5,7,26,27]. Some studies assessing injection practices of PWID are in relation to the development of skin and soft tissue infections [28] or infections in general [14,20,29].…”
Background: The rising incidence of infective endocarditis (IE) among people who inject drugs (PWID) has been a major concern across North America. The coincident rise in IE and change of drug preference to hydromorphone controlled-release (CR) among our PWID population in London, Ontario intrigued us to study the details of injection practices leading to IE, which have not been well characterized in literature. Methods: A case-control study, using one-on-one interviews to understand risk factors and injection practices associated with IE among PWID was conducted. Eligible participants included those who had injected drugs within the last 3 months, were > 18 years old and either never had or were currently admitted for an IE episode. Cases were recruited from the tertiary care centers and controls without IE were recruited from outpatient clinics and addiction clinics in London, Ontario. Results: Thirty three cases (PWID IE+) and 102 controls (PWID but IE-) were interviewed. Multivariable logistic regressions showed that the odds of having IE were 4.65 times higher among females (95% CI 1.85, 12.28; p = 0.001) and 5.76 times higher among PWID who did not use clean injection equipment from the provincial distribution networks (95% CI 2.37, 14.91; p < 0.001). Injecting into multiple sites and heating hydromorphone-CR prior to injection were not found to be significantly associated with IE. Hydromorphone-CR was the most commonly injected drug in both groups (90.9% cases; 81.4% controls; p = 0.197). Discussion: Our study highlights the importance of distributing clean injection materials for IE prevention. Furthermore, our study showcases that females are at higher risk of IE, which is contrary to the reported literature. Gender differences in injection techniques, which may place women at higher risk of IE, require further study. We suspect that the very high prevalence of hydromorphone-CR use made our sample size too small to identify a significant association between its use and IE, which has been established in the literature.
Amidst a substance use epidemic, hospitalizations and valve surgeries related to drug use-associated infective endocarditis (DU-IE) rose substantially in the last decade. Rates of reoperation and mortality remain high, yet in many hospitals patients are not offered valve surgery or evidence-based addiction treatment. A multidisciplinary team approach can improve outcomes in patients with infective endocarditis; however, the breadth of expertise that should be incorporated into this team is inadequately conceptualized. It is our opinion that incorporating addiction medicine services into the team may improve outcomes in DU-IE. Here, we describe our experience incorporating addiction medicine services into the multidisciplinary management of DU-IE and share implications for other hospitals and health systems looking to improve care for people with DU-IE.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.