2008
DOI: 10.1159/000152845
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Repeat Hepatic Resection Using a Radiofrequency-Assisted Technique

Abstract: Background: Repeat hepatic resection for recurrent primary or secondary liver cancer is performed due to advances in resection techniques and evidence of survival benefit. This paper presents the safety and efficacy of repeat radiofrequency-assisted hepatic resection to highlight the utility of the technique. Methods: 264 consecutive hepatic resections performed on 218 patients were identified. The subset of patients with recurrent disease (n = 24) suitable for repeat hepatic resection had their records review… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
(48 reference statements)
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Indications for liver resection have been continually extended over the past two decades, and currently include performing repeat liver resections for recurrent colorectal liver metastases [14,15,16] and HCCs [17,18], along with major hepatectomies for hilar cholangiocarcinomas [19]. Despite improvement in the safety of liver resections, the procedure is still associated with mortalities and postoperative complications, the most common of which are liver insufficiency, bile leaks and collections [20].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indications for liver resection have been continually extended over the past two decades, and currently include performing repeat liver resections for recurrent colorectal liver metastases [14,15,16] and HCCs [17,18], along with major hepatectomies for hilar cholangiocarcinomas [19]. Despite improvement in the safety of liver resections, the procedure is still associated with mortalities and postoperative complications, the most common of which are liver insufficiency, bile leaks and collections [20].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Large lesions are less effectively treated with ablation but they can be resected while small lesions can be ablated [106,107]. However, the combination of hepatic resection with ablation expands the number of surgical candidates.…”
Section: Tumor Ablationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is still true that surgical treatment in combination with oncological therapy is the only potentially curative treatment modality. The result is 5-year survival of 16–74% and 10-year survival of 9–69% in patients after R0 resection [ 5 ]. Unfortunately, only 10–25% of patients meet the criteria for implementation of R0 surgical resection at the time of diagnosis [ 6 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%