Environmental Governance in a Populist/Authoritarian Era 2020
DOI: 10.4324/9780429327032-30
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reparation Ecologies: Regimes of Repair in Populist Agroecology

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Repair, on this expanded scale, redresses some of the harms of uneven development and produces an alternative geography structured by relations of care and mutual flourishing. Literature on "reparations ecology" has grappled with the forebears and afterlives of socioecological harms and thefts (Cadieux et al 2019;Patel and Moore 2017), while Perry's (2020) proposal for a Global Climate Stabilization Fund aims to create a mechanism for the repayment of climate and other environmental debts in ways that deliver "climate reparations" (see also T a ıw o and Cibralic 2020).…”
Section: Repairmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Repair, on this expanded scale, redresses some of the harms of uneven development and produces an alternative geography structured by relations of care and mutual flourishing. Literature on "reparations ecology" has grappled with the forebears and afterlives of socioecological harms and thefts (Cadieux et al 2019;Patel and Moore 2017), while Perry's (2020) proposal for a Global Climate Stabilization Fund aims to create a mechanism for the repayment of climate and other environmental debts in ways that deliver "climate reparations" (see also T a ıw o and Cibralic 2020).…”
Section: Repairmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These are proposed along various pathways – such as agroecology, food sovereignty, and various anti-capitalist systems to resist capital’s spatial and socioecological fixes and profit-driven logics of ecological destruction (Escobar, 2017; Moore and Patel, 2017). Confronting necessary structural and systemic changes is tempered with bottom-up strategies, such as mutual aid, solidarity networks, and shared governance to sustain lives and livelihoods (Cadieux et al, 2019; Nelson, 2020; Springer, 2020). Together, these highlight the interconnections and interdependencies of individuals and systems in survival beyond the capitalist framework, while cautioning the limitations of seeking singular solutions.…”
Section: Alternative Visions and Pathwaysmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For structural transformation narratives, the fundamental problem is that growth in contemporary economies is dependent on fossil capital (Mitchell 2011) and plantation production (Wolford 2020), producing wealth that is maldistributed across classes, regions and economies (Hickel and Kallis 2020). The solution is not to tinker at the margins, temporarily easing the crises of capitalism through technological, market or state welfare fixes, but to transform the relations of production that generate climate change in the first place, through reparation, redistribution and decolonisation (Watts 2004;Cadieux et al 2019;Ajl 2020). This is a more radical vision of a 'green new deal' that restructures economies in favour of a low-carbon future under people's control (Ajl 2021;Mastini, Kallis, and Hickel 2021;Selwyn 2021).…”
Section: Structural Transformation Narrativesmentioning
confidence: 99%