2012
DOI: 10.1136/vr.e5981
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Repairing nictitans gland prolapse in dogs

Abstract: When repairing a nictitans gland prolapse correct positioning of sutures is critical

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
4
0
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
(4 reference statements)
0
4
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Moore and Morgan have described techniques that aim to embed the gland by creating a pocket [8,18]. The techniques aimed at pulling the gland through stitches are those described by Blogg, Gross, Albert, Kaswan-Martin, and Martin-Stanley [23,[31][32][33][34][35]. However, there is no consensus on the most effective technique [2].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moore and Morgan have described techniques that aim to embed the gland by creating a pocket [8,18]. The techniques aimed at pulling the gland through stitches are those described by Blogg, Gross, Albert, Kaswan-Martin, and Martin-Stanley [23,[31][32][33][34][35]. However, there is no consensus on the most effective technique [2].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently, replacement is recommended, with choice of surgical technique suggested to be a matter of personal clinician preference [ 1 ] (p. 964) [ 11 ], since no systematic comparisons are available for surgical outcomes. Similarly, different techniques are thought to vary in efficacy due to surgical complexity, breed conformation differences, effects on third eyelid mobility and cartilage position, gland function, and risks of complications and surgical failure [ 12 , 13 , 14 ]. In particular, repair is thought to be less successful in some giant and brachycephalic breeds (e.g., Neapolitan Mastiffs, English Bulldogs) [ 15 ] (p. 209) [ 16 ] (p. 54) and in cases of prolapse of long standing duration [ 17 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, topical corticosteroid use remains controversial; some veterinarians suggest that risk of surgical failure is higher in hypertrophied or inflamed glands while others discourage the use of perioperative steroids [ 18 , 19 ]. Currently, one technique (Morgan Pocket) is favored by a number of veterinarians, as it is thought to be easy to master and fairly effective [ 1 ] (p. 964) [ 3 ] (p. 80) [ 12 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although a variety of techniques for gland replacement have been published [ 7 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 ], there is limited data for comparative efficacy on surgical and lacrimal outcomes, particularly for breeds thought to be at higher risk for recurrence or for development of KCS. Morgan’s pocket technique is considered technically less challenging than some other procedures and is frequently covered in ophthalmology surgical texts [ 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 29 ], factors which may have driven popularity amongst respondents. Our finding that periosteal anchoring was suggested more frequently by PGs for revision surgery suggests that it may be favored in patients more prone to recurrence, a view reinforced by some authors [ 28 , 30 ] and a recent study showing decreased recurrence in English Bulldogs when pocketing was augmented with a periosteal tack [ 22 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%