1995
DOI: 10.1016/s1010-5182(05)80128-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Repair of human skull defects using osteoinductive bone alloimplants

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
22
0
1

Year Published

1997
1997
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
22
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The transfer of bone autograft remains the preferred reconstructive method but is inadequate for large defects (9,10). There has been recent interest in the development of new grafting materials using allogeneic, xenogeneic and synthetic bioimplants for reconstructive bony procedures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The transfer of bone autograft remains the preferred reconstructive method but is inadequate for large defects (9,10). There has been recent interest in the development of new grafting materials using allogeneic, xenogeneic and synthetic bioimplants for reconstructive bony procedures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These scaffolds derived from cortical and cancellous bone have been used extensively for clinical repair of bone injuries and abnormalities, including nonunion fractures, bone cysts, and cranio-maxillofacial reconstructions [1][2][3][4]. Both allografts and xenografts have been used in these clinical applications [1,[4][5][6][7][8]; however, the latter offers potential advantages in clinical therapies due to the unlimited supply of this bovine source of bone matrix, which is often restricted by donor availability when isolated from human sources [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Banked homologous fresh frozen cadaveric bone is nowadays routinely used in many surgeries [7, 13-16]. The risk of transmitting bacterial or viral infections undoubtedly exists, but it is markedly limited by the modern guidelines for bone procurement and processing.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, homologous bone for pediatric cranioplasty did not gain wide acceptance owing to the relative rarity of large defects in very young children [5, 13, 15, 16]. In 2010, Brevi et al [13] reported a 33-month-old patient with Ewing’s sarcoma whose residual large frontal defect was repaired using autologous parietal bone, while the donor site was reconstructed using cadaveric bone.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%