Repair of Direct Resin Composite Restorations

Arhun, Neslıhan; Tuncer, Duygu

doi:10.1007/978-3-319-60961-4_16

Cited by 4 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 154 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…1 The incidence of midline diastemas varies with age and race. 2 Higher prevalence of midline diastema has been reported in the maxilla than that of the mandible. Midline diastema can be caused by various conditions including 1.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Diastema closure with direct composite restoration-Case report

Priyanka

Verma²,

Jha³

et al. 2023

IDJSR

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Maxillary midline diastema is a frequently occurring malocclusion found to be a common aesthetic complaint of patients. It occurs due to of multifactorial etiology such as labial frenum, microdontia, and oral habits such as thumb sucking, Tongue thrusting, or Dental malformations. Proper technique and materials for successful treatment are grounded on time and the patient's physical, psychological, and economical conditions. The use of Direct composite resin restoration in diastema closure permits the dentist and patients to gain complete control of the above-mentioned and recreation of an aesthetic natural smile. The case report describes a case of midline diastema closure using direct composite resin restoration. The patient was recalled for follow-up for 1 year. No discoloration, sensitivity, line of demarcation, or fracture lines were seen. Therefore, midline diastema closure using direct composite resin restoration is considered highly aesthetic, and durable and could fulfill the aesthetic need of the patient in the present case.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Diastema closure with direct composite restoration-Case report

Priyanka

Verma²,

Jha³

et al. 2023

IDJSR

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

The shear bond strength of repaired high-viscosity bulk-fill resin composites with different adhesive systems and resin composite types

Oğlakçı

Arhun

2019

Journal of Adhesion Science and Technology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Effect of Aging and Different Surface Treatments on Repair Bond Strength of Hybrid Resin Composites

Saleh,

Hashem,

Salem

2023

TODENTJ

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: With the trend for minimally invasive dentistry and the rapid evolution of composite resin materials, repair of defective composite resin restorations is a popular choice rather than replacement of the restoration. The durability of the bond between the old and repaired composite restoration is important for a successful outcome. Objective: To evaluate the immediate and delayed shear bond strength of two types of repaired hybrid resin composites using different chemical and mechanical surface treatments. Methods: Two types of hybrid resin composites, micro-hybrid resin composite and nanohybrid resin composite, were used to prepare 288 pre-polymerized resin composite specimens. After polymerization, repair was done after 24 hours and 6 months. Each hybrid resin composite group was divided into 3 groups according to surface treatment used to repair the substrate: group 1: no surface treatment, group 2: treated by medium abrasive stone, and group 3: treated by fine abrasive stone. Each group was further subdivided into 3 subgroups according to different agents used for repair: group 1: Silane, group 2: Universal adhesive, and group 3: Silane + adhesive. Shear bond strengths of the repaired specimens were measured using a Universal testing machine. Failure modes were evaluated under a stereomicroscope. Results: Different chemical and mechanical surface treatments had a significant effect on the shear bond strength values of all groups (p ≤ 0.05). The highest mean shear bond strength values were found in nano-hybrid composites immediately repaired by silane after treatment by a medium abrasive stone while the lowest mean shear bond strength values were found in micro-hybrid composites with delayed repair and no surface treatment. Conclusion: Diamond burs using silane with adhesive improved the repair bond strength of the tested hybrid composites. In composite repair, using abrasive mechanical pretreatment followed by adhesive conditioning is crucial for the success of the repair restoration.

show abstract

Repair of Direct Resin Composite Restorations

Cited by 4 publications

References 154 publications

Diastema closure with direct composite restoration-Case report

Diastema closure with direct composite restoration-Case report

The shear bond strength of repaired high-viscosity bulk-fill resin composites with different adhesive systems and resin composite types

Effect of Aging and Different Surface Treatments on Repair Bond Strength of Hybrid Resin Composites

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About