1998
DOI: 10.1016/s0029-5493(97)00336-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Repair materials and techniques for concrete structures in nuclear power plants

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…18-20 A survey questionnaire has been sent to U.S. utilities to obtain information related to in-service inspection procedures, incidences of degradation, and repair procedures that have been utilized with respect to the concrete structures. 21 Responses to the survey questionnaire, provided by slightly less than half the commercial nuclear power plants in the U.S., indicated that the majority of problems associated with the concrete structures were the result of design and construction errors, generally initiated during construction, and have been corrected. + This indicates the overall effectiveness of quality control/quality assurance programs at nuclear power plants in ensuring that the factors associated with production of good quality concrete have been adequately addressed (e.g., material selection, batching, mixing, placing, and curing).…”
Section: Figure 22 Concrete Historical Timelinementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…18-20 A survey questionnaire has been sent to U.S. utilities to obtain information related to in-service inspection procedures, incidences of degradation, and repair procedures that have been utilized with respect to the concrete structures. 21 Responses to the survey questionnaire, provided by slightly less than half the commercial nuclear power plants in the U.S., indicated that the majority of problems associated with the concrete structures were the result of design and construction errors, generally initiated during construction, and have been corrected. + This indicates the overall effectiveness of quality control/quality assurance programs at nuclear power plants in ensuring that the factors associated with production of good quality concrete have been adequately addressed (e.g., material selection, batching, mixing, placing, and curing).…”
Section: Figure 22 Concrete Historical Timelinementioning
confidence: 99%
“…223 Guidelines for the repair of reinforced concrete structures have been developed. 21,158,[224][225][226][227][228] A reliability-based methodology has been developed that can be used to facilitate quantitative assessments of current and future structural reliability and performance of reinforced concrete structures in nuclear power plants. 229 The methodology is able to take into account the nature of past and future loads, and randomness in strength and in degradation resulting from environmental factors.…”
Section: Summary and Commentarymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The value of rebound of the hammer is recorded and correlated with the supplied standard charts to estimate the strength of the concrete. It is a hand-operated single-piece equipment which measures the surface hardness up to certain depth (Krauss, 1994). The operator places the impact plunger of the hammer against the concrete and then presses the hammer until the hammer releases.…”
Section: Rebound Hammermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Initially, degradation of NPP concrete structures in the U.S. occurred early in their life and has been corrected [37][38][39]. Causes were primarily related either to improper material selection and construction/design deficiencies, or environmental effects.…”
Section: Operating Experiencementioning
confidence: 99%