2020
DOI: 10.1007/s00253-020-10464-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Repair characteristics and time-dependent effects in response to heavy-ion beam irradiation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: a comparison with X-ray irradiation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this case, distinct mechanisms for dealing with oxidative stress in these organisms were observed [69]. Less comparative analysis has been done in fungi, but a recent study has reported on the transcriptional response to both heavy-ion (carbon) beam and x-ray irradiation in S. cerevisiae [70], which provides a good initial step, as S. cerevisiae is somewhat more susceptible than E. dermatitidis to IR. In that study, DNA repair pathways once again dominated the upregulated gene set, and those involved in translation were highly enriched among the downregulated genes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…In this case, distinct mechanisms for dealing with oxidative stress in these organisms were observed [69]. Less comparative analysis has been done in fungi, but a recent study has reported on the transcriptional response to both heavy-ion (carbon) beam and x-ray irradiation in S. cerevisiae [70], which provides a good initial step, as S. cerevisiae is somewhat more susceptible than E. dermatitidis to IR. In that study, DNA repair pathways once again dominated the upregulated gene set, and those involved in translation were highly enriched among the downregulated genes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…A transcriptomic and functional genetic analysis of Deinococcus radiodurans produced the same result [ 65 ]. Moreover, induction of RAD52 after irradiation is observed in S. cerevisiae [ 77 ] and in E. dermatitidis [ 9 , 41 ], but the regulation of its expression, or of RAD54 , do not appear to be required for them to carry out their normal functions [ 55 , 78 ], and the transcriptomic response (e.g., induction of DNA repair proteins, inhibition of growth) is either largely similar across many organisms of varying sensitivity to γ-radiation [ 66 , 77 , 79 , 80 , 81 ], or has been shown not to assist in the identification of DNA repair genes at all [ 25 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because acute ionizing radiation exposure causes extensive oxidative stress, and protein synthesis (including changes in proteomic composition) can occur at time scales much lower than 1 h [ 9 , 41 , 91 ], we typically consider this length of time to be ample to observe changes at any level that can be scrutinized by current -omic technologies. However, the surprisingly small number of changes that we observed here suggests that a more exhaustive and extended time course should be explored in the future with regard to any proteomic response in this organism, and particularly with the response to γ-radiation exposure, as there is evidence in other fungi of different patterns of regulation over time, upon irradiation [ 62 , 77 ]. Another possibility is that the gene induction we have previously observed is unimportant, at least for these strains, and the factors that are responsible for the improved γ-radiation resistance in the Evolved strain are constitutively present.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this case, distinct mechanisms for dealing with oxidative stress in these organisms were observed (Qiu et al, 2006). Less comparative analysis has been done in fungi, but a recent study has reported on the transcriptional response to both heavyion (carbon) beam and X-ray irradiation in S. cerevisiae (Guo et al, 2020), which provides a good initial step, as S. cerevisiae is somewhat more susceptible than E. dermatitidis to IR. In that study, DNA repair pathways once again dominated the upregulated gene set, and those involved in translation were highly enriched among the downregulated genes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%