Reorienting adolescent sexual and reproductive health research: reflections from an international conference

Abstract

On December 4th 2014, the International Centre for Reproductive Health (ICRH) at Ghent University organized an international conference on adolescent sexual and reproductive health (ASRH) and well-being. This viewpoint highlights two key messages of the conference - 1) ASRH promotion is broadening on different levels and 2) this broadening has important implications for research and interventions – that can guide this research field into the next decade. Adolescent sexuality has long been equated with risk and danger. However, throughout the presentations, it became clear that ASRH and related promotion efforts are broadening on different levels: from risk to well-being, from targeted and individual to comprehensive and structural, from knowledge transfer to innovative tools. However, indicators to measure adolescent sexuality that should accompany this broadening trend, are lacking. While public health related indicators (HIV/STIs, pregnancies) and their behavioral proxies (e.g. condom use, number of partners) are well developed and documented, there is a lack of consensus on indicators for the broader construct of adolescent sexuality, including sexual well-being and aspects of positive sexuality. Furthermore, the debate during the conference clearly indicated that experimental designs may not be the only appropriate study design to measure effectiveness of comprehensive, context-specific and long-term ASRH programmes, and that alternatives need to be identified and applied. Presenters at the conference clearly expressed the need to develop validated tools to measure different sub-constructs of adolescent sexuality and environmental factors. There was a plea to combine (quasi-)experimental effectiveness studies with evaluations of the development and implementation of ASRH promotion initiatives.

Supply kits for antenatal and childbirth care during antenatal care and delivery: a mixed-methods systematic review, the qualitative approach.

“…Factors pointed by this review affecting the use of the CDK are not very different from barriers and facilitators found in other studies assessing the utilization of other health services within ANC [7, 29, 30]. In several African and Asian countries, it is a common practice among pregnant women to seek for traditional medication or TBAs as first line providers since they perceive facility birth as less convenient.…”

Building Realist Program Theory for Large Complex and Messy Interventions

“…Such complexity needs to be reflected in any research evaluating these interventions. Research studies of sexual health interventions must be designed to consider local contexts; experimental designs alone are not sufficient to understand why certain ideas work, or do not, in particular contexts (Michielsen et al, 2016;Santelli & Schalet, 2009). Several scholars have argued that research approaches, rooted in a realist philosophy of science, may support the accrual of knowledge concerning how complex interventions, such as sexual health services, work (Clark, 2013a;Pawson & Tilley, 1997;Westhorp, 2012).…”

Why not? Understanding the spatial clustering of private facility-based delivery and financial reasons for homebirths in Nigeria

“…According to these studies, women perceive home delivery with a TBA, and especially with family members present, to be personal and supporting [ 41 ]. Some TBAs often allow for flexible finance options, such as payment in kind or in instalments, making it easier for families to pay [ 42 ].…”