2001
DOI: 10.3138/9781442679221
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reordering the Natural World

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
9
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…People's view of nature will influence the way in which wildlife is controlled or managed in urban environments. Thus, the way in which people construct their idea of animals reflects their conception, not only of nature, but also of society (Sabloff, ). Botkin () explains that environmental issues can only be effectively confronted once people change their perception of nature.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…People's view of nature will influence the way in which wildlife is controlled or managed in urban environments. Thus, the way in which people construct their idea of animals reflects their conception, not only of nature, but also of society (Sabloff, ). Botkin () explains that environmental issues can only be effectively confronted once people change their perception of nature.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There were a lot of people who were upset about Samson, and this is a way for them to heal’ ” (Tardani 1997a:A10). Unlike artistic renderings of wildlife in public settings where people may never have any contact with such animals (Sabloff 2001), this sculpture compels the viewer both to confront the assault on Samson and to consider the memorial's implicit claim—that Estes is a community which affirms, unequivocally, the intrinsic value of wildlife and the natural world.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Naturalists are likely to extend their creed well beyond ecomorphic constructions of charismatic species. They are also likely to deconstruct discourses that divide nature and culture (Sabloff 2001), critique theologies that marginalize and subordinate the nonhuman, deride rigid demarcations between good and bad animals, spotlight contradictions enervating purportedly “pro‐environmental” messages (King 1994), and challenge imagined geographies' prevailing orthodoxies about place, animals, and the natural world (Wolch and Emel 1998; Philo and Wilbert 2000). In addition, they are likely to assail the reigning, human‐centered conception of community as reductionistic and exclusionary, and propose replacing it with a more inclusive, ecologically informed vision of the terminal community.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most social scientists today recognize that the ontological separation between nature and culture is a modernist fiction (Latour 1993). It has become sociological commonsense that animals and nature are socially and culturally mediated (Greider and Garkovich 1994;Herda-Rapp and Goedeke 2005;Sabloff 2001). Recent schol-ars, particularly in several edited volumes of cultural geography (Anderson et al 2003;Philo and Wilbert 2000;Wolch and Emel 1998), focus on how humans' situated relations with animals both reflect and structure their understandings of self and community.…”
Section: Nature and Culturementioning
confidence: 99%