2018
DOI: 10.1155/2018/3743710
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reoptimization Heuristic for the Capacitated Vehicle Routing Problem

Abstract: The solution to a dynamic context of the Capacitated Vehicle Routing Problem (CVRP) is challenging. Routing and replenishment decisions are necessary by considering the assignment of customers to vehicles when the information is gradually revealed over horizon time. The procedure to solve this type of problems is referred to as route reoptimization, which is the best option for minimizing expected transportation cost without incurring failures of unsatisfied demand on a route. This paper proposes a heuristic a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
(61 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…DVRPs with various characteristics have been studied, including the consideration of differing transportation modes, varying logistical contexts like pickup and/or delivery problems, the consideration of application specific constraints, different modifications like the insertion of new customer requests or changes in travel time, and others [27]. A great variety of solution methods for these NP-hard problems [27] has been proposed including tabu search [15,22], genetic algorithms [1], local search approaches [23], particle swarm optimization [19] and insertion heuristics [13]. Nevertheless, for all of the above approaches guarantees on the resulting solution quality are either impossible to give due to the nature of the applied metaheuristics or have not been investigated by the research.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…DVRPs with various characteristics have been studied, including the consideration of differing transportation modes, varying logistical contexts like pickup and/or delivery problems, the consideration of application specific constraints, different modifications like the insertion of new customer requests or changes in travel time, and others [27]. A great variety of solution methods for these NP-hard problems [27] has been proposed including tabu search [15,22], genetic algorithms [1], local search approaches [23], particle swarm optimization [19] and insertion heuristics [13]. Nevertheless, for all of the above approaches guarantees on the resulting solution quality are either impossible to give due to the nature of the applied metaheuristics or have not been investigated by the research.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main challenge of these metaheuristics is to solve large combinatorial optimization problems in an adequate time period. Different authors have used metaheuristic algorithms to solve VRP: local search [24], simulated annealing [25], greedy randomized adaptive search procedure (GRASP) [26], swarm intelligence [27], tabu search (TS) [28,29], genetic algorithms [30], colony optimization [31], reactive search [32], and maximum coverage [33].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Zulvia proposed a hybrid ant-colony optimization and genetic algorithm for solving CVRP with a time window and fuzzy travel time and demand [ 16 ]; Osman Gokalp proposed a novel algorithm based on iterated local search and the random variable neighborhood descent metaheuristic method for the purpose of solving CVRP [ 17 ]; Mahmuda Akhtar presented a modified backtracking search algorithm in CVRP models, with the smart bin concept to find the best optimized waste collection path distances [ 18 ]; Sami Faiz developed a decision support system for solving CVRP that integrated GIS enriched by a tabu search model [ 19 ]; Chengming Qi proposed a two-stage hybrid Ant Colony System (ACS) algorithm for CVRP that minimized the number of vehicles used and travel cost [ 20 ]; A. Gomez presented a new artificial bee colony algorithm for solving CVRP [ 21 ]; M. Ammi and S. Chikhi proposed an island model for solving CVRP, which consists of using a paradigm, called the island model, that rules the cooperation held by different islands [ 22 ]; S.L. Gadegaard proposed a new polynomially sized formulation of the well-known symmetric CVRP [ 23 ]; Yiyong Xiao presented a mathematical optimization model to formally characterized the fuel consumption rate considered in CVRP [ 24 ]; Rodrigo Linfati proposed a heuristic algorithm for the reoptimization of CVRP in which the number of customers increases, which uses the proposed performance to reduce route dispersion and minimize length [ 25 ]; Jiashan Zhang presented a novel two-phase heuristic approach for the CVRP to overcome limitation [ 26 ]; Ali Asghar Rahmani Hosseinabadi introduced a new metaheuristic optimization algorithm to solve CVRP that is based on the law of gravity and group interactions [ 27 ]; Asma M. Altabeeb proposed a new hybrid firefly algorithm to solve CVRP [ 28 ]; Hadi Karimi investigated various stabilization techniques for improving the column generation algorithm and proposed a novel stabilization technique specialized for CVRP [ 29 ]; A.K.M. Foysal Ahmed proposed an efficient algorithm, bilayer local search-based particle swarm optimization, along with a novel decoding method to solve CVRP [ 30 ]; Mauro Dell’Amico proposed a new iterated local search metaheuristic method for CVRP that also includes a vital mechanism from the adaptive large neighborhood search combined with further intensification through local search [ 31 ]; R. Baldacci described a new integer programming formulation for CVRP based on a two-commodity network flow approach [ 32 ]; Fernando Afonso Santos introduced a branch-and-cut-and-price algorithm for two-echelon CVRP [ 33 ]; Jiafu Tang developed a BEAM–MMAX algorithm that combines a MAX–MIN ant system with beam search to solve CVRP [ 34 ]; Jacek Mańdziuk proposed a solution to CVRP with traffic jams, which relies on application of the upper confidence ...…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%