The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
1997
DOI: 10.1016/s0090-3019(96)00250-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reoperation for recurrent trigeminal neuralgia after microvascular decompression

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

1
23
0
4

Year Published

2000
2000
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
23
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…5 42 Liao et al found that after 80 MVD procedures there were 5 cases of recurrence within 12 months. 29 Barker et al 5 examined 1185 patients who underwent an MVD for TN over a 20-year period. Patients were followed for 1 year or longer after surgery, with 91% having at least 5 years' follow-up.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…5 42 Liao et al found that after 80 MVD procedures there were 5 cases of recurrence within 12 months. 29 Barker et al 5 examined 1185 patients who underwent an MVD for TN over a 20-year period. Patients were followed for 1 year or longer after surgery, with 91% having at least 5 years' follow-up.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A review of the literature reveals a wide range of recurrence rates of approximately 6%-41%. 5,6,8,10,11,22,23,25,[27][28][29]33,[36][37][38][39][41][42][43][44] Surgical alternatives after recurrence include repeat exploration for recurrent vascular compression and microvascular decompression (MVD), internal neurolysis, or radiofrequency lesioning. Other alternatives for recurrent TN include partial or complete sensory rhizotomy, balloon rhizotomy, glycerol injections, and radiosurgery.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The higher rates of cranial nerve deficits are reported in those conditions usually enhancing the surgical morbidity of MVD procedures, such as in the case of neurovascular conflicts difficult to correct (i.e. depending upon a megadolichobasilar artery) [20] or in case of reoperations performed to treat pain recurrence [21,[31][32][33]. Trigeminal dysesthesia occurs in 1.3%-19% of patients, while no cases of trigeminal anesthesia dolorosa have been described [10,20,21,23,29].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main cause of recurrence is adhesion between the implant and the adjacent neurovascular structures. 1,2,7,9) Transposition techniques have recently been used instead of interposition techniques to avoid such adhesion. The sling retraction technique is particularly recommended.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%