During the past decade, the incomes of poor Americans have fallen or flat-lined, housing costs have soared and public policy has failed to bridge the gap. As a result, the majority of poor renting families in America now devote at least half of their income to covering housing costs, and eviction has become a common yet consequential event in their lives. While housing is central to the lives of the urban poor, it remains marginal to the sociology of American inequality. This essay begins by charting the growing rent burden among low-income households, and then draws on the unique contributions of Pierre Bourdieu to the study of the home to sketch an agenda for analyzing the roots and implications of the loss of affordable urban housing, a prerequisite for offering policy prescriptions.
The collapse of affordable rental housing in AmericaFor almost a century, there has been broad consensus in America that families should spend no more than 30% of their income on housing, allowing enough money for other necessities, such as food and transportation. Until recently, most renting families met this goal. But times have changed, especially for the urban poor. As Figure 1 shows, the number of renting families below the poverty line spending less than 30% of their income on housing costs fell from 1.3 million in 1991 to 1.07 million in 2013, even as the number of renting families in the country grew. Meanwhile, the number of poor renting households spending over half of their income on housing costs rose from 2.04 million in 1991 to 2.85 million in 2013. Today, over half (52%) of all poor renting families in America spend over 50% of their income on housing, and one family in four spends over 70% on rent and utilities. Black and Hispanic families, the majority of whom rent their housing (Pendall et al., 2005), are disproportionately affected by these trends.These figures are truly staggering, both from a historical and an international perspective. Historically, the American Housing Survey (2013) did not even have a category for renting households paying more than 70% of their income on rent. In 1975, for example, the upper bound of this variable was set at '50% or more'. By international standards, the percentage of families in the United States that are severely rent burdened is extraordinarily high. In 2010, only 4% of households in Finland and Portugal, 16.5% of those in the United Kingdom and 22% of those in Denmark spent more than 40% of their disposable income on housing (European Commission, 2013). This does not imply that rising rent burdens are unique to the American poor. The US case may be extreme--in part because severe deprivation here has no real equivalent in the developed world--but housing costs have surged in cities around the globe, from Vancouver to Zurich, Sydney to Mumbai (Gyourko et al., 2013).Eviction has become commonplace in poor urban neighborhoods. In New York City alone, over 350,000 cases are processed through the housing court each year, the vast majority of which allege nonpayme...