2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.remn.2012.01.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rentabilidad diagnóstica de los estudios PET/TC basal y de seguimiento en la terapia ablativa del cáncer de pulmón de células no pequeñas

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 19 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…During this time, a CT was performed to examine and to evaluate the efficacy. [26] Whereas positron emission tomography-computed tomography was more accurate than CT. The efficacy of RFA was evaluated for a time period of 3 successive months.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During this time, a CT was performed to examine and to evaluate the efficacy. [26] Whereas positron emission tomography-computed tomography was more accurate than CT. The efficacy of RFA was evaluated for a time period of 3 successive months.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%