2011
DOI: 10.1057/ces.2011.17
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rent-Seeking, Hierarchy and Centralization: Why the Soviet Union Collapsed So Fast and What it Means for Market Economies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In fact, consumer goods markets existed to about the same extent in the Soviet Union as they did in Lange's model of market socialism (Nell 2010b). The problem, as Mises (1996Mises ( [1949) explained, is that without a capital goods market, the consumer goods market is not a true market-producing firms must be able to bid on capital goods in order to produce what consumers demand efficiently and in the right amounts-just as the "internal markets" that large corporations create to try to determine the cost of intermediate goods (see Carson,chapter 3) are not true markets, and mirror the pseudo-markets of Soviet firm managers (see Nell 2010a).…”
Section: What (Post-)austrian Market Socialism Can and Cannot Bementioning
confidence: 95%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…In fact, consumer goods markets existed to about the same extent in the Soviet Union as they did in Lange's model of market socialism (Nell 2010b). The problem, as Mises (1996Mises ( [1949) explained, is that without a capital goods market, the consumer goods market is not a true market-producing firms must be able to bid on capital goods in order to produce what consumers demand efficiently and in the right amounts-just as the "internal markets" that large corporations create to try to determine the cost of intermediate goods (see Carson,chapter 3) are not true markets, and mirror the pseudo-markets of Soviet firm managers (see Nell 2010a).…”
Section: What (Post-)austrian Market Socialism Can and Cannot Bementioning
confidence: 95%
“…It is implicit when, for example, they argue that labor-saving home appliances and falling food prices (which, they say, come with economic growth) help the poor more than they help the rich or oppose lump-sum taxes on the grounds that they are essentially regressive because a $1,000 tax affects the poor more than the rich (it is a clear double standard to not apply the logic in reverse) (Horwitz 2009;Lynch 1971;Matthews 1997: 193). Nell (2013) explores in more detail the flaws in Rothbard's argument (see also Burczak 2013 andMiller 1989a). 4 Burczak (2013) shows that the error is linked to another double standard, in which he sees a "join-or-starve" coercive situation for workers with regard to unions, but not when they face a "private" monopolistic employer and fear of starvation.…”
Section: Austrian Blind Spots and Double Standardsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations