2007
DOI: 10.1007/s11127-007-9255-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rent-seeking contests with incomplete information

Abstract: We consider rent-seeking contests with two players that each have private information about their own cost of effort. We consider both discrete and continuous distributions of costs and give results for each case, focusing on existence of equilibria.JEL Classification: D72; C72

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
72
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 86 publications
(74 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
1
72
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…To see the intuition of our result, let us directly compare the equilibrium e¤orts 13 One can also extend this to an incomplete information setting (Malueg and Yates, 2004;Fey, 2008). Allowing types A i 2 fA L ; A H g, each agent has a probability of drawing A L with 1/2 and A H with 1/2.…”
Section: Comparison Of Pigouvian and Coasean Solutions 341 Equilibrmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To see the intuition of our result, let us directly compare the equilibrium e¤orts 13 One can also extend this to an incomplete information setting (Malueg and Yates, 2004;Fey, 2008). Allowing types A i 2 fA L ; A H g, each agent has a probability of drawing A L with 1/2 and A H with 1/2.…”
Section: Comparison Of Pigouvian and Coasean Solutions 341 Equilibrmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2 Shogren (1998a, 1998b) consider other special cases. Fey (2008) proves existence of equilibrium in a model where the type of each player is drawn from a uniform distribution.…”
Section: Delegationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ewerhart (2010) fully characterizes the Bayesian equilibrium for symmetric rent-seeking contests with independent private valuations and Ewerhart (2014) shows uniqueness of the equilibrium for continuous types. Fey (2008) and Wasser (2013) introduce informational asymmetries on the costs of effort provision. In Morath and Münster (2013) players may acquire information on their valuations, and opponents observe whether or not information was acquired but do not learn the information.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%