Renorming and Custom Norming: How, When, and Why?

Dean, Suzanne L.; Miller, Corey E.; Caputo, Pat M.; Delgado, Kristin M.; Killian, James H.; Leasher, Megan K.; Mueller, Stephen F.

doi:10.1037/e518332013-346

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Review Of Existing Professional Guidelines1

Citation Types

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Year Published

2015

Publication Types

Select...

Article1

Relationship

Self Cite0

Independent1

Authors

Journals

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Similar score shifts have also occurred in some personality assessments (Dean, ; Kabins & McCook, ). Introduced in the 1940s, the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (MMPI; Tellegen & Ben‐Porath, ) was renormed in the 1980s during development of the MMPI‐2.…”

Section: Review Of Existing Professional Guidelinessupporting

confidence: 69%

A Comparative Review of Current Practices in Personality Assessment Norming

Gaddis

Foster

Lemming

2015

Int J Selection Assessment

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Because consequential personnel decisions are often made by comparing an individual against a norm group, having accurate and representative norms is as important as having sound selection procedures. Existing standards provide specific guidance on selection procedures, but are less clear on norms. To fill this gap and define best practices, we (a) review existing literature and guidelines; (b) review current applied practices using 30 personality assessments offered in the United States, United Kingdom, and Canada; and (c) provide recommendations for strengthening existing guidelines and helping publishers develop, present, and apply norms for personality assessments.

show abstract

Section: Review Of Existing Professional Guidelinessupporting

confidence: 69%