2004
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.70.033306
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Renormalization of spin-orbit coupling in quantum dots due to the Zeeman interaction

Abstract: We derive analitycally a partial diagonalization of the Hamiltonian representing a quantum dot including spin-orbit interaction and Zeeman energy on an equal footing. It is shown that the interplay between these two terms results in a renormalization of the spin-orbit intensity. The relation between this feature and experimental observations on conductance fluctuations is discussed, finding a good agreement between the model predictions and the experimental behavior.

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…͑For a harmonic potential describing single dots, operators H lin op have been derived 56 for the case of finite magnetic field, so that the Zeeman term can be included into H 0 .͒ Up to the second order in the perturbation couplings ͑being now ␣ SO and ␣ Z ͒, there is no coupled Zeeman-spin-orbit term. This means that in the effective Hamiltonians H eff that we already derived for the case of zero magnetic field, the Zeeman term appears as a shift of the energies on the diagonal without bringing any new couplings ͑nondiagonal terms͒.…”
Section: Effective Spin-orbit Hamiltonianmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…͑For a harmonic potential describing single dots, operators H lin op have been derived 56 for the case of finite magnetic field, so that the Zeeman term can be included into H 0 .͒ Up to the second order in the perturbation couplings ͑being now ␣ SO and ␣ Z ͒, there is no coupled Zeeman-spin-orbit term. This means that in the effective Hamiltonians H eff that we already derived for the case of zero magnetic field, the Zeeman term appears as a shift of the energies on the diagonal without bringing any new couplings ͑nondiagonal terms͒.…”
Section: Effective Spin-orbit Hamiltonianmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1B). Such result emphasizes the intricate competition between external magnetic field and intrinsic SO coupling in QDs [6]. In GaAs QDs, the anisotropic nature of the g-factor is much more pronounced, despite the small values of the SO constants.…”
mentioning
confidence: 85%
“…In general, SO effects have been considered via perturbation theory [3], although exact treatments have also been presented [4,5]. The perturbative approach, which includes only a few states, has been called into question by the demonstration that a larger basis is needed in order to achieve convergence even for the lowest QD states when the QD vertical width is narrow [4], as a complex interplay between different energy scales can be present [6]. Insights on the purity of the spin degree of freedom of electrons in QDs can also be extracted from measurements of their effective g-factor, e.g., by means of capacitance [7] and energy [8] spectroscopies.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(8), depends quadratically on the intensities of the different spin-orbit terms, in contrast with the situation at zero magnetic field, where the effect in the spectrum depends linearly on these intensities. For a quantum dot, when only Zeeman and Rashba terms are considered [19], the interplay between the above terms modifies the spin-orbit intensity, while the kinetic term manifests a weak dependence on the spit-orbit coupling. For g * = 0 (Zeeman term is absent) in a quantum dot, the kinetic term and the spin-orbit coupling remain without modifications.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%