1997
DOI: 10.1088/0305-4470/30/18/029
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Renormalization in non-relativistic quantum mechanics

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
36
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
1
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Strictly, even though a more careful treatment with dimensional regularization changes Eq. (17), the difference appears only at the level of the finite parts (linear in ǫ) and is immaterial to the arguments presented here. These corrections, as well as a detailed analysis of the scattering sector of the theory, will be presented elsewhere.…”
mentioning
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Strictly, even though a more careful treatment with dimensional regularization changes Eq. (17), the difference appears only at the level of the finite parts (linear in ǫ) and is immaterial to the arguments presented here. These corrections, as well as a detailed analysis of the scattering sector of the theory, will be presented elsewhere.…”
mentioning
confidence: 89%
“…This problem is crucial for the analysis and interpretation of the point dipole interaction of molecular physics [10,11], and may be relevant in polymer physics [12]. In addition (i) it displays remarkable similarities with the two-dimensional δ-function potential [13][14][15]; (ii) it provides another example of dimensional transmutation [16] in a system with a finite number of degrees of freedom; and (iii) it illustrates the relevance of field-theoretic concepts in quantum mechanics [13][14][15]17].This problem is ideally suited for implementation in configuration space [18], where the radial Schrödinger equation for a particle subject to the r −2 potential in D dimensions [19] reads (withh = 1 and 2m = 1)which is explicitly scale-invariant because λ is dimensionless [20]. In Eq.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of papers 22,23,24,25,26,27 discussed the peculiar features which arise in this EFT when one naively implements different regularization schemes. Ultimately though, the issue here was not associated with the use of a specific regularization scheme.…”
Section: You Can't Choose Your Neighbors: Living Near a Fixed Pointmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a case in point, we treat the density matrix of the Lieb-Liniger gas [9], an object of considerable interest to both cold gases [10,11] and integrable systems [12] communities.The GML-RG suggests itself very naturally in problems where a physical quantity at one value of a param-eter is given as an expansion in terms of the value of the same quantity at another value of the parameter, a situation usually caused by regularization and renormalization [5]. A simple single-parameter example is Twhich is the Born series for the scattering problem for the 2D delta-function potential [13]; T (k) is the complex-valued function one is trying to determine (Tmatrix), µ > 0 is a constant (mass), and the expansion holds for all k a , k b > 0 (momenta). The expansion would not seem to be useful unless k b /k a ≈ 1; however, we may try a "divide and conquer" approach: instead of going from k a to k b in a single large step, we use many smaller steps, k a = k 0 → k 1 → k 2 → · · · → k N = k b , for each of which k j+1 /k j ≈ 1.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%