Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2003
DOI: 10.1142/s0217979203018193
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Renormalization-Group Approach to the Stochastic Navier–stokes Equation: Two-Loop Approximation

Abstract: The field theoretic renormalization group is applied to the stochastic Navier-Stokes equation that describes fully developed fluid turbulence in d > 2 dimensions. For the first time, the complete two-loop calculation of the renormalization constant, the β function, the fixed point and the ultraviolet correction exponent is performed. The Kolmogorov constant and the inertial-range skewness factor are expressed in terms of universal (in the sense of the theory of critical behavior) quantities, which allows one t… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
34
0
10

Year Published

2004
2004
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
(57 reference statements)
2
34
0
10
Order By: Relevance
“…Unfortunately, the interesting physical case, obtained for y = 4 and corresponding to the Kolmogorov spectrum for the velocity field, lies in a range where convergence of the RG expansion is not granted [25]. Notwithstanding extensions of the RG formalism to y ∼ O(1), values which have been attempted by different approaches [23,24], the problem is still open. Recent numerical simulations tried to shed light on this issue [26,27] but, because of the limited resolution, their results are not conclusive.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unfortunately, the interesting physical case, obtained for y = 4 and corresponding to the Kolmogorov spectrum for the velocity field, lies in a range where convergence of the RG expansion is not granted [25]. Notwithstanding extensions of the RG formalism to y ∼ O(1), values which have been attempted by different approaches [23,24], the problem is still open. Recent numerical simulations tried to shed light on this issue [26,27] but, because of the limited resolution, their results are not conclusive.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Размерный анализ действия (7) для пространственной размерности d > 2 [8], [11] показывает, что модель является логарифмической при ε = 0, т. е. постоянная вза-имодействия g 0 в этой точке безразмерна, и что наивные УФ-расходимости имеют вид полюсов по ε и представлены только в одночастично-неприводимых функциях ⟨v…”
Section: ренормгрупповой анализunclassified
“…Здесь коэффициенты z В случае отсутствия спиральности (ρ = 0) разложение постоянных перенорми-ровки Z i , i = 1, 2, известно с точностью до второго порядка по g (двухпетлевое приближение) [8], [9], [11]. Простейший однопетлевой результат для z…”
Section: ренормгрупповой анализunclassified
“…The problem has also been eased by an intricate analysis of the large-scale stirring (sweeping), using "short-distance operator-product expansions" in the RNG analysis, and accounting for Galilean invariance (see, e.g., Ref. [17]). …”
Section: Modern Mathematical Fluid Mechanics Began In 1755 Withmentioning
confidence: 99%