1984
DOI: 10.1103/physrevd.29.312
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Renormalization-group analysis of dynamical symmetry breaking in QCD

Abstract: We perform a renormalization-group analysis of the dynamical symmetry breaking in QCD based on the Nambu-Jona-Lasinio approach. We show how the mass scale that the fermions acquire in dynamical symmetry breaking can be calculated in terms of the invariant cutoff. We also determine the high-energy behavior of the quark two-point function.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

1986
1986
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This solution also appears when using an improved renormalization group approach in QCD, associated to a finite quark condensate [36], and it minimizes the vacuum energy as long as > n 5 f [37]. Moreover, this specific solution is the only one consistent with Regge-pole like solutions [28].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This solution also appears when using an improved renormalization group approach in QCD, associated to a finite quark condensate [36], and it minimizes the vacuum energy as long as > n 5 f [37]. Moreover, this specific solution is the only one consistent with Regge-pole like solutions [28].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was noted in [21] that the absence of a conventional mass term led to broken PT symmetry and so it is natural, at the perturbative level, to consider a massive theory. Moreover one approach to dynamical mass generation [28] is to consider a theory with a mass which is then determined self-consistently through a gap equation [29].…”
Section: The Yukawa Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the end of the calculation of the two-point one-particle-irreducible (1PI) functions for the scalar and the fermion, we set M 2 = ∆M 2 and ∆m = m [29]. The renormalised two point 1PI functions for the fermion and scalar are assumed to behave like…”
Section: Dynamical Mass Generationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In that spirit, then, there is no question about the higher-order correc-1 tions to the NJL gap equation. y T = x + % ( I n $ -y g ) = O In 1984, we [22] applied the N J L formulation of the selfconsistent generation of mass to the renormalizable QCD. If M is the effective quark mass at zero four momentum, and a solution that is now genuinely independent of p .…”
Section: Gap Equationmentioning
confidence: 99%