2018
DOI: 10.3917/reco.693.0373
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Renoncer aux soins périnataux : quelles conséquences sur l’état de santé du nourrisson ?

Abstract: De nombreuses études ont mis au jour les mécanismes intergénérationnels à l'oeuvre dans la construction des inégalités de santé. Ces travaux convergent vers l'idée que l'état de santé d'un individu est en grande partie lié aux comportements adoptés par ses parents, parfois avant même sa naissance. Cette contribution vient compléter cette idée et ces études. Notre objectif est d'étudier l'impact du renoncement aux soins de la future mère sur l'état de santé de son nourrisson à la naissance. Pour ce faire, nous … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, to tackle the potential endogeneity issue of both physical activity and health status, we apply recursive multivariate probit model that involves the use of instrumental variables estimation. The instruments should not be directly related to healthcare utilization, except for their link to physical activity and overall health status [ 100 , 101 ]. For health status, the instrumental variables are represented by the education level of respondents’ parents [ 102 ] and their attitude towards the future [ 102 ], while for physical activity, the membership to an association or a sport club was considered as a proxy for the distance to physical fitness and sports facilities [ 101 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, to tackle the potential endogeneity issue of both physical activity and health status, we apply recursive multivariate probit model that involves the use of instrumental variables estimation. The instruments should not be directly related to healthcare utilization, except for their link to physical activity and overall health status [ 100 , 101 ]. For health status, the instrumental variables are represented by the education level of respondents’ parents [ 102 ] and their attitude towards the future [ 102 ], while for physical activity, the membership to an association or a sport club was considered as a proxy for the distance to physical fitness and sports facilities [ 101 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The impact of health status on the use of medicine is quite obvious, but the reverse causality between the two variables is based on the idea that medicine use may determine the health status of individuals due to the side effects of the consumption of medical drugs. To tackle the potential endogeneity issue of health status, we employed a recursive bivariate probit model that involves the use of instrumental variables estimation (Maddala,1983;Ancelot et al,2018). Instruments are explanatory variables that have an impact on health status but do not directly explain the probability of using medication, meaning that the effect of instrumental variables on medicines use is captured indirectly via health status.…”
Section: Empirical Strategymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Notes:(1) The reference categories for each independent variables are:80 years and older (age group for the whole population); 45-64 years (age group for those younger than 65 years old); 80 years and older (age group for those of 65 years and older); female (sex of respondent); primary education level (education); unmarried (legal marital status); unemployed (employment status); less than 1st quintile (income level); obese (BMI status); daily (smoking); high-risk (alcohol consumption risk profile); insufficient (nutritionfruits and vegetables consumption); very good health (health status). (2) *** indicate the rejection of null hypothesis for 1%; ** indicate the rejection of null hypothesis for 5%; * indicate the rejection of null hypothesis for 10%.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%