1999
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.82.3726
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Renneret al.Reply:

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

11
67
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(78 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
11
67
0
Order By: Relevance
“…If attending to uncertainties reported in the careful and independent investigations performed most recently in [24][25][26], the average energy needed for an α-particle to produce a photon around this band, for electric fields high enough to suppress charge recombination, is nowadays known to a precision of around one eV in the region 1-10 bar: W sc = 35.0±1.2 eV. Although uncertainties in W sc for X-ray and electron excitation have been historically reported to be considerably larger, in the range 60-110 eV [27][28][29][30], recent studies point to values compatible with the ones measured for α particles [31]. Furthermore, state of the art calculations of the seed states stemming from X-ray and MeV-electron excitation [32], once coupled to a microscopic description of the atomic/excimer cascade, can reproduce the main features of the scintillation spectrum of weakly quenched xenon mixtures [33], providing W sc = 39 ± 1 eV in the pressure range 1-10 bar.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If attending to uncertainties reported in the careful and independent investigations performed most recently in [24][25][26], the average energy needed for an α-particle to produce a photon around this band, for electric fields high enough to suppress charge recombination, is nowadays known to a precision of around one eV in the region 1-10 bar: W sc = 35.0±1.2 eV. Although uncertainties in W sc for X-ray and electron excitation have been historically reported to be considerably larger, in the range 60-110 eV [27][28][29][30], recent studies point to values compatible with the ones measured for α particles [31]. Furthermore, state of the art calculations of the seed states stemming from X-ray and MeV-electron excitation [32], once coupled to a microscopic description of the atomic/excimer cascade, can reproduce the main features of the scintillation spectrum of weakly quenched xenon mixtures [33], providing W sc = 39 ± 1 eV in the pressure range 1-10 bar.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An alternative perspective on weak and strong pseudogap behavior comes from ARPES [22,23] and tunneling experiments [24] , which focus directly on single particle excitations. Above T * , ARPES experiments show that the spectral density of quasiparticles located near the (π, 0) part of the Brillouin zone, develops a high energy feature, a result which suggests that the transfer of spectral weight from low energies to high energies for part of the quasiparticle spectrum may be the physical origin of the weak pseudogap behavior seen in NMR experiments.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Covellite is a 2D material with a very good cleavage parallel to the basal plane and atomic resolution have been achieved by Scanning Tunnelling Microscopy/ Spectroscopy (STM/STS) at room temperature (Rosso & Hochella, 1999). Due to the low T c , STS experiments could be conducted using the same methodology as Renner et al (1998) on cuprates: a sweep in temperature well above and well below T c in order to check for a pseudo-gap above T c , as suggested by NMR experiments (Gainov et al, 2009). These experiments will also check for the f-wave symmetry claimed by Mazin (2012).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%