2020
DOI: 10.1136/openhrt-2020-001353
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Renin–angiotensin–aldosterone system inhibitors and the risk of mortality in patients with hypertension hospitalised for COVID-19: systematic review and meta-analysis

Abstract: ObjectiveThe association between the use of renin–angiotensin–aldosterone (RAAS) inhibitors and the risk of mortality from COVID-19 is unclear. We aimed to estimate the association of RAAS inhibitors, including ACE inhibitors (ACEi) and angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs) with COVID-19 mortality risk in patients with hypertension.MethodsPubMed (MEDLINE) SCOPUS, OVID, Cochrane Library databases and medrxiv.org were searched from 1 January 2020 to 1 September 2020. Studies reporting the association of RAAS i… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
46
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
(31 reference statements)
0
46
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[6][7][8] Others concluded that prior ACEi/ARB use reduced the risk of mortality and ICU admission, and decreased length of stay. [9][10][11][12][13][14] There is theoretical basis for both deleterious and protective effects of these agents in SARS-CoV-2 infection. 22 Notably however, there is no substantial clinical evidence that ACEi/ARB use worsens outcomes in COVID-19 when compared to appropriately matched controls.…”
Section: Comparisons With the Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[6][7][8] Others concluded that prior ACEi/ARB use reduced the risk of mortality and ICU admission, and decreased length of stay. [9][10][11][12][13][14] There is theoretical basis for both deleterious and protective effects of these agents in SARS-CoV-2 infection. 22 Notably however, there is no substantial clinical evidence that ACEi/ARB use worsens outcomes in COVID-19 when compared to appropriately matched controls.…”
Section: Comparisons With the Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Broadly these suggest that antecedent ACEi/ARB therapy is not associated with worsened outcomes in COVID-19, and that their use might confer certain protective benefits. [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14] The impact of ACEi/ARB provision during acute COVID-19 illness has been inadequately examined. To date few studies have attempted to address this question.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is a growing concern that the immunosuppressing nature of HIV 4 may make people living with HIV/AIDS (PLWHA) more susceptible to SARS-CoV-2 infection and more likely to present with severe COVID-19 when infected. Mounting evidence shows PLWHA with low CD4 counts as well as those not on antiretroviral (ARV) therapy have the greatest risk of contracting severe symptoms of COVID-19 6 , 7 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There was a long discussion regarding the impact of antihypertensive therapy in COVID-19 patients and particularly of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEI) and blockers of angiotensin I receptors (ARB). After initial reports that showed higher prevalence of use of these medications in COVID-19 patients with cardiac injury and more severe course of disease ( 8 , 9 ), numerous original studies and meta-analysis reported no relationship with severity or mortality in COVID-19 patients ( 10 , 11 ) or even benefit of taking renin-angiotensin-aldosterone inhibitors in COVID-19 patients ( 12 , 13 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%