2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.biombioe.2016.05.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Renewable energy from thermophilic anaerobic digestion of winery residue: Preliminary evidence from batch and continuous lab-scale trials

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
34
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
6
34
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Showing an uncertain trend regarding the removal of organic matter and the inoculum/substrate ratios, as well as in Córdoba et al (2018). Ros et al (2016) obtained percentages of VS removal, also with grape marc residue of 12 -35%. Figure 1b shows that the I/S 3.0 ratio obtained the best performance in percentage of removal (77.5%), a ratio that also obtained the best specific production of methane in relation to volatile solids.…”
Section: Organic Removalsmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Showing an uncertain trend regarding the removal of organic matter and the inoculum/substrate ratios, as well as in Córdoba et al (2018). Ros et al (2016) obtained percentages of VS removal, also with grape marc residue of 12 -35%. Figure 1b shows that the I/S 3.0 ratio obtained the best performance in percentage of removal (77.5%), a ratio that also obtained the best specific production of methane in relation to volatile solids.…”
Section: Organic Removalsmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Evidencing that the higher the concentration of added inoculum in relation to the substrate, the higher the production of methane per gram of volatile solids, with an increase of 70% when the I/S ratio varied from 0.75 to 3. Ros et al (2016) obtained for grape marc, during 40 days, 360 L CH4 Kg -1 VSadd. Fabbri et al (2015) also using grape marc, obtained 145-254 L CH4 Kg -1 VSadd.…”
Section: Methane Yieldmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Efforts to recover phenols from grape marc, using ultrasound [84] and solvents (ethanol, methanol) [85] and supercritical fluid consecutive [86] extraction method, have been made with a high success rate. Grape marc on its own or as a part of an agroindustrial substrate mixture has also been used effectively as an anaerobic digestion substrate for the generation of biogas and methane [87][88][89] and it is estimated that a smallmedium fully operational winery could produce 7800 kW h year -1 electrical and 8900 kW h year -1 thermal energy. Further studies using grape marc for biotechnological production of goods are summarised in Table 4.…”
Section: Utilisation Of Grape Marc and Vine Shoots As Substratementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previously, Makadia et al [12] proceeded through the codigestion of grape marc with other organics in "wet" anaerobic digestion (AD) systems for methane generation. There are indications that the optimisation of energy recovery utilising GM as a substrate in anaerobic systems holds the potential for valorisation of this abundant sustainable resource [13]. However, energy recovery through any of the thermal conversion processes mentioned above (viz.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%