2006
DOI: 10.1007/s00013-005-1513-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rendezvous numbers of metric spaces – a potential theoretic approach

Abstract: Abstract. The present work draws on the understanding how notions of general potential theory -as set up, e.g., by Fuglede -explain existence and some basic results on the "magical" rendezvous numbers. We aim at a fairly general description of rendezvous numbers in a metric space by using systematically the potential theoretic approach.In particular, we generalize and explain results on invariant measures, hypermetric spaces and maximal energy measures, when showing how more general proofs can be found to them… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Also the Wiener energy w(K) has connection to invariant measures, as shown by the following result, which is a simplified version of a more general statement from [10], see also Wolf [26].…”
Section: Average Distance Number and The Maximum Principlementioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Also the Wiener energy w(K) has connection to invariant measures, as shown by the following result, which is a simplified version of a more general statement from [10], see also Wolf [26].…”
Section: Average Distance Number and The Maximum Principlementioning
confidence: 94%
“…It was proved in [10] that one always has M(K) = r(K), so once we have an invariant measure, then the Chebyshev constant is again easy to determine.…”
Section: Average Distance Number and The Maximum Principlementioning
confidence: 97%
“…-can all be conveniently described by potential theory, hence it is natural to expect general versions of the results known so far. For these see [9].…”
Section: Concluding Remarks and Hints Of Further Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [11] the background to our work, and in particular related work by other authors (see [1,4,7,8,15], for example), was discussed in some detail, and this discussion will not be repeated here.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%