Abstract-This article provides a chronological perspective on the development of knowledge concerning the neural control of renal function and is divided into three parts: the past, the present, and the future.
The PastResearch in the area of the neural control of renal function was not very active for the first half of the 20th century. This can be attributed to 2 factors. First, the renowned renal physiologist, Homer Smith, rendered an opinion that the renal nerves were of little functional consequence. [1][2][3] This was based on his interpretation of experiments involving renal denervation in anesthetized and surgically operated animals. He criticized this approach, as he believed that the starting level of renal sympathetic nerve activity (RSNA) would be quite elevated, owing to the associated stress, so that "denervation hyperemia and diuresis appear to be a release from enhanced vasoconstriction engendered by anesthesia and traumatic operative procedures." 3 Second, there was a lack of convincing evidence that the renal innervation extended beyond the renal vasculature to either the tubules or the juxtaglomerular apparatus. The demonstration by Luciano Barajas 4 that all segments of the renal tubule (as well as the juxtaglomerular apparatus) were innervated by norepinephrine-containing renal sympathetic nerve terminals that make contact with the renal tubular epithelial cell basement membrane paved the way for increased research activity in this area. This critical observation reconfirmed once again the important relationship between structure and function.Given the powerful influence of changes in renal hemodynamics (ie, arterial pressure, glomerular filtration rate [GFR] and renal blood flow [RBF]) on urinary sodium excretion (U Na V), it was evident that the influence of changes in RSNA on U Na V must be examined in experimental protocols in which these variables remained constant. By using electrical stimulation of the efferent renal sympathetic nerves at frequencies just subthreshold for decreases in RBF, it was shown that a reversible decrease in U Na V occurred in the absence of changes in GFR (ie, filtered sodium load), RBF, and arterial pressure. 5 These results indicated that lowfrequency renal sympathetic nerve stimulation increased overall renal tubular sodium reabsorption via a direct action on the renal tubule, independent of changes in renal hemodynamics. Additional experiments demonstrated that this effect occurred in the proximal convoluted tubule, the thick ascending limb of Henle's loop, the distal convoluted tubule, and the collecting duct. 6,7 Subsequent work (reviewed in DiBona and Kopp 8 ) showed that this was owing to the release of norepinephrine from renal sympathetic nerve terminals with stimulation of postsynaptic ␣ 1 -adrenoceptors located on the basolateral membrane of renal tubular epithelial cells throughout the nephron. Subsequent intracellular signaling events resulted in an increase in activity of the sodium pump (Na ϩ ,K ϩ -ATPase), with increased transepithelial sod...