2018
DOI: 10.1038/s41440-018-0147-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Renal nerves contribute to hypertension in Schlager BPH/2J mice

Abstract: Schlager mice (BPH/2J) are hypertensive due to a greater contribution of the sympathetic nervous system (SNS) and renin angiotensin system (RAS). The kidneys of BPH/2J are hyper-innervated suggesting renal nerves may contribute to the hypertension. We therefore determined the effect of bilateral renal denervation (RD) on hypertension in BPH/2J. Mean arterial pressure (MAP) was measured by radiotelemetry before and for 3 weeks after RD in BPH/2J and BPN/3J. The effects of pentolinium and enalaprilat were examin… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
17
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
1
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A major characteristic of the BPH/2 strain is a markedly exaggerated day-night difference in BP, HR, and activity compared to the normotensive BPN/3 (Jackson et al, 2014b), C57/Bl6 (Davern et al, 2009), and hypertensive BPH/ApoE mice (Figure 1; Al-Sharea et al, 2019). This day-night difference was small and did not reach statistical significance in the first telemetry study with BPH/2 mice (McGuire et al, 2007) but has been observed in most if not all subsequent studies (Palma-Rigo et al, 2011; Davern et al, 2014; Jackson et al, 2014b,d, 2016; Stevenson et al, 2017; Gueguen et al, 2019; Watson et al, 2019). Reports of HR measured by the tail-cuff technique are variable as to whether BPH/2 mice are tachycardic (Schlager and Sides, 1997) or not (Schlager, 1974) but radio-telemetric measurement of HR under non-stressed conditions consistently shows that BPH/2 mice have higher HR than the normotensive BPN/3 mice (McGuire et al, 2007; Davern et al, 2009).…”
Section: Development and Cardiovascular Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 82%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…A major characteristic of the BPH/2 strain is a markedly exaggerated day-night difference in BP, HR, and activity compared to the normotensive BPN/3 (Jackson et al, 2014b), C57/Bl6 (Davern et al, 2009), and hypertensive BPH/ApoE mice (Figure 1; Al-Sharea et al, 2019). This day-night difference was small and did not reach statistical significance in the first telemetry study with BPH/2 mice (McGuire et al, 2007) but has been observed in most if not all subsequent studies (Palma-Rigo et al, 2011; Davern et al, 2014; Jackson et al, 2014b,d, 2016; Stevenson et al, 2017; Gueguen et al, 2019; Watson et al, 2019). Reports of HR measured by the tail-cuff technique are variable as to whether BPH/2 mice are tachycardic (Schlager and Sides, 1997) or not (Schlager, 1974) but radio-telemetric measurement of HR under non-stressed conditions consistently shows that BPH/2 mice have higher HR than the normotensive BPN/3 mice (McGuire et al, 2007; Davern et al, 2009).…”
Section: Development and Cardiovascular Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…Greater tyrosine hydroxylase staining in the kidney of BPH/2 mice also indicated sympathetic hyperinnervation (Jackson et al, 2013) which has been seen in other models of hypertension such as SHR (Cassis et al, 1985). More recently, renal noradrenaline levels were reported to be markedly greater in BPH/2 compared with BPN/3 mice and bilateral renal denervation was shown to reduce the hypertension by one-third in BPH/2 mice without affecting BP in BPN/3 mice (Gueguen et al, 2019). Interestingly, the hypotensive response may also involve the renin-angiotensin system (RAS) since the enhanced renin mRNA levels in BPH/2 mice were normalized following renal denervation (Gueguen et al, 2019).…”
Section: Sympathetic Contribution To the Hypertension In Bph/2 Micementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, renal denervation (RD) has regained attention with the development of minimally invasive catheter-based technology to selectively ablate the renal nerves in humans [5]. Since then, several clinical and experimental studies have explored the therapeutic value of RD in hypertension and associated adverse complications [2,[6][7][8][9]. Notwithstanding, the data available are still controversial and the underlying mechanisms are not clear yet.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%