1996
DOI: 10.1016/s0022-2143(96)90117-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Renal function reserve and sodium sensitivity in essential hypertension

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We previously investigated the glomerular haemodynamics using the pressure-natriuesis relationship in non-sodium sensitive and sodium sensitive type of essential hypertension, and demonstrated that reduced whole kidney ultrafiltration coefficient was the principal mechanism of sodium sensitivity. 10 Since HOMA insulin resistance index did not differ between non-sodium sensitive and sodium sensitive subjects, enhanced tubular sodium reabsorption by insulin resistance might not be the major determinant of sodium sensitivity. In fact, our study showed significant but weak relationships among sodium sensitivity, insulin resistance and tubular sodium reabsorption, indicating that the sodium sensitivity of BP is determined only in part by enhanced tubular sodium reabsorption in essential hypertension, while mostly by reduced ultrafiltration coefficient.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…We previously investigated the glomerular haemodynamics using the pressure-natriuesis relationship in non-sodium sensitive and sodium sensitive type of essential hypertension, and demonstrated that reduced whole kidney ultrafiltration coefficient was the principal mechanism of sodium sensitivity. 10 Since HOMA insulin resistance index did not differ between non-sodium sensitive and sodium sensitive subjects, enhanced tubular sodium reabsorption by insulin resistance might not be the major determinant of sodium sensitivity. In fact, our study showed significant but weak relationships among sodium sensitivity, insulin resistance and tubular sodium reabsorption, indicating that the sodium sensitivity of BP is determined only in part by enhanced tubular sodium reabsorption in essential hypertension, while mostly by reduced ultrafiltration coefficient.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Patients whose 24-h average of mean arterial pressure was lowered by more than 10% by sodium restriction were assigned to the sodium sensitive group based on Bartter's original definition, 3,4 the remaining patients were assigned to the non-sodium sensitive group. In addition, sodium sensitivity index was calculated as the ratio of the change in mean arterial pressure over the change in urinary sodium excretion rate induced by sodium restriction, which was the reciprocal of the slope of the pressure natriuresis curve, 1,2,10,15,16,[30][31][32] and which represented how much BP was affected by each mmol of sodium intake per day altered in the steady state. 1,2 Plasma glucose and insulin response during a standard oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) were determined in all subjects on a regular sodium diet.…”
Section: Study Protocolmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In addition to the non-dipper pattern, the salt sensitivity of BP is closely linked to glomerular capillary hypertension 28,46,60 and insulin resistance. [61][62][63][64][65][66] The non-dipper pattern, 67-73 microalbuminuria 74,75 (a marker for glomerular capillary hypertension), 76,77 insulin resistance and metabolic syndrome [78][79][80][81] are all known to be strong risk factors for cardiovascular events.…”
Section: Salt Sensitivity and Strokementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, postural change in systemic haemodynamics would not probably play a key role in the difference of the postural changes in natriuresis patterns between dippers and non-dippers. We showed previously that nocturnal fall in BP [8][9][10] and renal function reserve in response to chronic protein load 19 was impaired in salt-sensi-…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%