2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejim.2007.06.023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Renal artery stenosis in chronic renal failure: Caution is advised for percutaneous revascularization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
9
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…666 Others advise caution in performing percutaneous revascularization in patients with CKD. 667 Early acute functional renal injury related to renal interventions in patients with atherosclerotic RAS was analyzed in a prospective study of patients who averaged Ͼ70 years of age. 668 Indications for the procedure were poorly controlled hypertension, associated CKD (creatinine Ͼ1.5 mg/dL), diabetes mellitus, and hyperlipidemia.…”
Section: Percutaneous Renal Artery Stentingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…666 Others advise caution in performing percutaneous revascularization in patients with CKD. 667 Early acute functional renal injury related to renal interventions in patients with atherosclerotic RAS was analyzed in a prospective study of patients who averaged Ͼ70 years of age. 668 Indications for the procedure were poorly controlled hypertension, associated CKD (creatinine Ͼ1.5 mg/dL), diabetes mellitus, and hyperlipidemia.…”
Section: Percutaneous Renal Artery Stentingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some suggest that stenting for atherosclerotic RAS can stabilize declining kidney function; however, for patients with stable renal function, the benefit is less clear (666). Others advise caution in performing percutaneous revascularization in patients with CKD (667).…”
Section: Diabetes Mellitusmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the case reports, 12 patients experienced no further symptoms after PTRA, two patients had one more episode, one patient had two episodes of flash oedema, and in five patients this was not described ( Table ). In the case series and cohort studies,,, 42 patients showed no recurrent flash oedema after revascularization, three patients suffered from one episode, seven patients experienced at least one episode of flash oedema, and four subjects reported ‘relief of symptoms’.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We included 19 case reports and six single‐centre case series,, and retrospective studies. We excluded one patient described by Pun et al .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%