2017
DOI: 10.5539/ibr.v10n2p135
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Remuneration Committees’ Gender Composition as a Determinant of Executive Board Compensation Structure

Abstract: This paper investigates the relationship between the gender composition of firms' remuneration committees and the relative weight of variable monetary compensation in these firms' top executives' compensation packages. Previous archival research into executive compensation has mainly relied on agency theory, managerial power theory and tournament models to construct its theoretical frameworks. However, both psychological and corporate governance-related research concerning gender differences in, for instance, … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Additionally, three binary variables were used in the econometric models: − SECTOR -indicating a company's specific sector and taking a value of 1 for financial companies and a value of 0 for other sectors (Yamina & Mohamed, 2017), − GENDER -identifying gender diversity among CEOs, which influences EC (Borrenbergs et al, 2017); it takes a value of 0 for a male-only group of CEOs and 1 for companies in which at least one CEO is a woman, − NEG -to distinguish between periods when a company made profits and when it incurred losses as recommended by conditional conservatism (Basu, 1997); it takes a value of 1 for a loss and 0 for a profit. The comparison of CI and NI in terms of their associations with executive compensation was performed using a three-step procedure.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, three binary variables were used in the econometric models: − SECTOR -indicating a company's specific sector and taking a value of 1 for financial companies and a value of 0 for other sectors (Yamina & Mohamed, 2017), − GENDER -identifying gender diversity among CEOs, which influences EC (Borrenbergs et al, 2017); it takes a value of 0 for a male-only group of CEOs and 1 for companies in which at least one CEO is a woman, − NEG -to distinguish between periods when a company made profits and when it incurred losses as recommended by conditional conservatism (Basu, 1997); it takes a value of 1 for a loss and 0 for a profit. The comparison of CI and NI in terms of their associations with executive compensation was performed using a three-step procedure.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This scarce but emerging literature investigates mainly whether top management pay and corporate performance are more aligned in companies with gender-diverse compensation committees, leading to mixed results. The study by Borrenbergs et al ( 2017 ), investigates the relationship between female presence in the remuneration committee and the relative weight of performance contingent pay for top executives. The findings, based on a detailed analysis of a sample of public US and Canadian firms, show strong evidence supporting the fact that gender-diverse compensation committees are associated with lower levels of annual bonuses in top executives' remuneration contracts (variable short-term compensation).…”
Section: Gender Diversity Discrimination and Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other Scholars (e.g. Smith, Smith, & Verner, 2011;Borrenbergs, Vieira, & Georgakopoulos, 2017) have reported similar proportions of female CEOs in other countries. We, therefore, re-run our pay models after including a dummy that represents female CEOs and find almost identical results (not reported).…”
Section: Ceo Compensation Robustness Checkmentioning
confidence: 67%