2021
DOI: 10.1190/geo2020-0623.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Removing the Courant-Friedrichs-Lewy stability criterion of the explicit time-domain very high degree spectral-element method with eigenvalue perturbation

Abstract: The explicit time-domain spectral-element method (SEM) for synthesizing seismograms hasgained tremendous credibility within the seismological community at all scales. Althoughthe recent introduction of non-periodic homogenization has addressed the spatial meshing difficulty of the mechanical discontinuities, the Courant-Friedrichs-Lewy (CFL) stability criterionstrictly constrains the maximum time step, which still puts a great burden on the numericalsimulation. In the explicit time-domain SEM, the source of in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
(59 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…If different global and local time steps are adopted, different temporal dispersion errors will be introduced into the local simulation, resulting in inaccurate waveforms to an extent. Note that the spatial and temporal dispersion errors have been proven to be irrelevant (Koene et al., 2018; Lyu, Capdeville, Lu, & Zhao, 2021), which provides a theoretical basis for eliminating the temporal dispersion errors in the global and hybrid simulations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If different global and local time steps are adopted, different temporal dispersion errors will be introduced into the local simulation, resulting in inaccurate waveforms to an extent. Note that the spatial and temporal dispersion errors have been proven to be irrelevant (Koene et al., 2018; Lyu, Capdeville, Lu, & Zhao, 2021), which provides a theoretical basis for eliminating the temporal dispersion errors in the global and hybrid simulations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To ensure a fair benchmark, we compare the DFDM simulations with those from the SEM using the same centered second‐order time integration scheme with a displacement formulation to remove any errors caused by differences in time formats. As we know, the spatial and temporal dispersion errors have been proven to not be relevant (Gao et al., 2018; Koene et al., 2018; Lyu, Capdeville, Lu, & Zhao, 2021) under the framework of the FDM, pseudospectral method, and SEM. The spatial and temporal dispersion errors of DFDM also follow this rule because of the successful analytical removal of the time‐dispersion error (Masson & Virieux, 2023).…”
Section: Numerical Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%