2018
DOI: 10.4491/eer.2018.112
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Removing nitrogenous compounds from landfill leachate using electrochemical techniques

Abstract: In this research, applicability of electrochemical technology in removing nitrogenous compounds from solid waste landfill leachate was examined. Novel cathode material was developed at laboratory by introducing a Cu layer on Al substrate (Cu/Al). Al and mild steel (MS) anodes were investigated for the efficiency in removing nitrogenous compounds from actual leachate samples collected from two open dump sites. Al anode showed better performances due to the effect of better electrocoagulation at Al surface compa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
2
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
(35 reference statements)
0
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast, the obtained TN removal was 29.8%, slightly lower than the previous study (Nanayakkara et al 2018), which acquired 32.66% of TN removal. The TN removal is due to the electrochemical oxidation and reduction that possibly occurred simultaneously in the anode and cathode compartments, respectively.…”
Section: Removal Of Toc and Tncontrasting
confidence: 77%
“…In contrast, the obtained TN removal was 29.8%, slightly lower than the previous study (Nanayakkara et al 2018), which acquired 32.66% of TN removal. The TN removal is due to the electrochemical oxidation and reduction that possibly occurred simultaneously in the anode and cathode compartments, respectively.…”
Section: Removal Of Toc and Tncontrasting
confidence: 77%
“…Similar to color, delayed NO 3 − -N removals were observed using Fe electrodes at current densities of 10 and 30 mA cm −2 for the first 30 and 20 min, respectively, while negligible NO 3 − -N removal was noticed at 50 mA cm −2 within 10 min of treatment (Figure 3c). The slight increase in NO 3 − -N levels during the initial stages of the process suggests that the NH 4 + -N in the SLL was partially converted into NO 3 − -N at the anodic Fe electrode when the respective electrical currents were applied [77,78]. The NO 3 − -N produced along with that already existing in the SLL were subsequently reduced to nitrite, ammonia (NH 3 ) and nitrogen gas (N 2 ) at the Fe cathode with simultaneous anode oxidation [21,67,78].…”
Section: Effect Of Current Density and Electrode Materialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The slight increase in NO 3 − -N levels during the initial stages of the process suggests that the NH 4 + -N in the SLL was partially converted into NO 3 − -N at the anodic Fe electrode when the respective electrical currents were applied [77,78]. The NO 3 − -N produced along with that already existing in the SLL were subsequently reduced to nitrite, ammonia (NH 3 ) and nitrogen gas (N 2 ) at the Fe cathode with simultaneous anode oxidation [21,67,78].…”
Section: Effect Of Current Density and Electrode Materialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MET can be divided largely into two types, microbial fuel cell and microbial electrolysis cell (MEC). This bioelectrochemical technique has attracted considerable attention from an increasing number of researchers because of its unique advantages of strong sustainability, high treatment efficiency, and low cost (Nanayakkara et al, 2019). Under anaerobic condition, pollutants such as nitrobenzene (Wang et al, 2012), chlorophenol (Wen et al, 2013), antibiotics (Kong et al, 2015), and polychlorinated biphenyl (PCB) (Yu et al, 2017) can be reduced effectively using MEC cathode when low DC voltage is applied; meanwhile, MET can also generate electric energy to reduce the external energy consumption (Korshin & Yan, 2018; Tiwari et al, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%