2022
DOI: 10.1007/s00264-022-05329-w
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Removing a suprapatellar intramedullary nail via a suprapatellar approach: a retrospective cohort study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Five studies [ 20 , 21 , 41 43 ] reported the angular alignment and the difference of the angle was significant between the two groups in the coronal plane (SMD = – 1.74[ – 2.22, – 1.26]; p < 0.00001; I 2 = 84%), while it was not significant in the sagittal plane (SMD = – 1.18[ – 2.59,0.24]; p < 0.10; I 2 = 98%) (Fig. 4 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Five studies [ 20 , 21 , 41 43 ] reported the angular alignment and the difference of the angle was significant between the two groups in the coronal plane (SMD = – 1.74[ – 2.22, – 1.26]; p < 0.00001; I 2 = 84%), while it was not significant in the sagittal plane (SMD = – 1.18[ – 2.59,0.24]; p < 0.10; I 2 = 98%) (Fig. 4 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Five studies [ 23 , 25 , 29 , 33 , 43 ] reported the distance alignment, and one paper was excluded from this meta-analysis because it reported only the median of the quartile spacing, while Anderson et al[ 23 ] found better distance alignment in the coronal plane in their study. Both the differences in the distance between the two groups in the coronal plane (SMD = – 1.47[ – 2.18, – 0.77]; p = 0.04; I 2 = 65%) and sagittal plane (SMD = – 3.12[ – 5.54, – 0.69]; p < 0.01; I 2 = 91%) were significant (Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations