2015
DOI: 10.1080/19443994.2015.1043650
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Removal studies of lead onto activated carbon derived from lignocellulosicMangifera indicaseed shell

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
4
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Nasiruddin Khan et al used activated carbon produced from lignocellulose materials to remove the Pb. The highest removal rate occurred at 45°C and the adsorption efficiency increased with increasing temperature, while the adsorption efficiency decreased with increasing temperature in this study, which is inconsistent with the results obtained from this section (30). Cai et al used the CNs reinforced composite to remove the chromium.…”
Section: Effect Of Temperaturecontrasting
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Nasiruddin Khan et al used activated carbon produced from lignocellulose materials to remove the Pb. The highest removal rate occurred at 45°C and the adsorption efficiency increased with increasing temperature, while the adsorption efficiency decreased with increasing temperature in this study, which is inconsistent with the results obtained from this section (30). Cai et al used the CNs reinforced composite to remove the chromium.…”
Section: Effect Of Temperaturecontrasting
confidence: 98%
“…Other test solutions were prepared daily by diluting the stock solution with the distilled water. Variable factors included pH (4, 5, 6, 7, and 8), initial Pb concentration (10,20,30,40, and 50 mg/L), and adsorbent dosage (0.1, 0.3, 0.6, 0.8, and 1 g).…”
Section: Preparation Of Standard Lead Stock Solutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results show that the adsorption process is better adjusted to the Freundlich model (R ¼ 0.98). Even though the K F parameter of Freundlich is related to the adsorption capacity, it does not provide the maximum removal capacity, since the Freundlich model does not predict adsorbent saturation (Khan et al 2016). The value of the Freundlich constant obtained was 19.05, the value of n (6,6) indicates that the adsorption is favorable.…”
Section: Adsorption Isothermmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Kardam et al (2014) reported that both Langmuir and Freundlich isotherm models, almost identically, had a high fit for the removal process of cadmium, nickel, and lead from aqueous solutions by cellulose nanofibers [31]. Nasiruddin Khan et al (2015) reported that the lead removal process by lignocellulosic activated carbon was more consistent with the Freundlich isotherm model [32]. The copper removal process by chitin adsorbent, which was studied by Labidi et al (2016) was evaluated and showed that the resulting data were more consistent with the Langmuir isotherm [33].…”
Section: Evaluation Of Adsorption Isothermsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…In this model, it is assumed that a surface contains a certain number of equivalent sites where absorbable ions can be chemically or physically attached to that site. Physical adsorption includes Van der Waals collisions and chemical adsorption includes the formation of covalent bonds between adsorbate and adsorbent [30][31][32][33].…”
Section: Evaluation Of Adsorption Isothermsmentioning
confidence: 99%