1995
DOI: 10.1007/bf02035984
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Removal of60Co and134Cs from radioactive process waste water by flotation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nevertheless, it would be extremely useful for batch adsorption in a rapid contact mixing tank, where the waste could then be easily dewatered using flotation, for example [41][42][43][44][85][86][87].…”
Section: Accepted Manuscriptmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Nevertheless, it would be extremely useful for batch adsorption in a rapid contact mixing tank, where the waste could then be easily dewatered using flotation, for example [41][42][43][44][85][86][87].…”
Section: Accepted Manuscriptmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another technique that may potentially be used to increase natural ion capacity, is to expose additional exchange sites through increasing the surface area to volume ratio by milling [39,40]. While fine milled particles would not be practically used in traditional ion-exchange columns, there has been increasing interest in combining batch adsorption contact tanks with flotation, giving highly efficient uptake and rapid de-watering of nuclear effluents [41][42][43][44].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to separate radioactive heavy metal ions from aqueous waste streams, there are a number of techniques that can be used, including ion exchange, co-precipitation, and coagulation methods; selective membranes; as well as the use of nano-adsorbents or organic conjugate materials [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19]. The use of ion exchange media is perhaps the commonly used technique in the nuclear industry, due to the high specific decontamination factors, low production of secondary wastes, reliability, and cost effectiveness [8,9,16,20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While primarily adapted for mineral separation [36,37], it has gained increasing use as a rapid solid-liquid separation technique for wastewater sludges and mineral wastes, reducing unit footprints and enhancing throughput rates when compared to traditional gravity separators. Indeed, there has been a number of studies published on its use to separate nuclear wastes and adsorbents used for effluent treatment [14,[37][38][39][40][41][42][43]. PI methods are also being used in conjunction with the development of related nanotechnologies for effluent treatment [44], such as with rapid magnetic separation methods to capture and recycle magnetic nano-adsorbents [45,46].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%