1975
DOI: 10.1016/0043-1354(75)90061-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Removal of viruses from water by sorption on coal

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

1977
1977
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Compared with other available sorption material, such as carbonbased media, clay minerals, metal oxides/hydroxides and activated carbon, LDH demonstrates substaintially higher removal efficiency and capacity. For example, Oza and Chaudhuri [16][17][18] found that bituminous coal could only remove 70% of bacteriophages (T4 and MS2) from an aqueous solution.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared with other available sorption material, such as carbonbased media, clay minerals, metal oxides/hydroxides and activated carbon, LDH demonstrates substaintially higher removal efficiency and capacity. For example, Oza and Chaudhuri [16][17][18] found that bituminous coal could only remove 70% of bacteriophages (T4 and MS2) from an aqueous solution.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pervious studies have suggested that some materials such as coal‐based media, clay minerals, metal oxides–hydroxides, and activated carbon could be used for virus removal. For example, 70% of bacteriophages (T4 and MS2) were removed from an aqueous solution by bituminous coal (Oza and Chaudhuri, 1975, 1976). Gupta and Chaudhuri (1995) reported that some coal‐based media (bituminous coal and lignite treated with aluminum or ferric hydroxide) have very high sorption capacities for polioviruses and that sorption by these materials is very rapid.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Batch adsorption tests have confirmed that microorganisms adsorb exclusively to the exterior surface of GAC due to pore size exclusion (24,25,27), but they do not provide information that is sufficient to predict removal rates in columns. Mass transfer models can be used to characterize chemical removal with GAC in packed beds, but they do not provide detailed information concerning particle removal mechanisms.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%