2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2010.07.057
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Removal of steroid estrogens in carbonaceous and nitrifying activated sludge processes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

4
33
0
2

Year Published

2010
2010
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
4
33
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This is in agreement with the findings of other research where loadings of c. 0.05-0.5 mg EDC m −3 d −1 [26] were applied. In this study porous pot loadings ranged from c. 0.04 to 2.8 EDC m −3 d −1 .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…This is in agreement with the findings of other research where loadings of c. 0.05-0.5 mg EDC m −3 d −1 [26] were applied. In this study porous pot loadings ranged from c. 0.04 to 2.8 EDC m −3 d −1 .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…The co-metabolic activity of ammonia oxidising bacteria has been postulated to fortuitously oxidise steroid estrogens [28]. However, the heterotrophic bacteria constituent of nitrifying activated sludge cannot be ignored [26,32]. Indeed, an average total estrogen removal of >51% has been recently observed for carbonaceous activated sludge [26].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Sorption and biodegradation are important mechanisms for the removal of estrogens in biological wastewater treatment systems (Xu et al, 2008;McAdam et al, 2010;Gomes et al, 2011;Paterakis et al, 2012). Based on the measured sorption constants, Andersen et al (2005) have predicted that about 50%-75% of estrogens (estrone [E1], E2, and EE2) can be sorbed to the activated sludge in a sewage treatment plant.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%