2009
DOI: 10.1186/1477-7827-7-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Removal of spermatozoa with externalized phosphatidylserine from sperm preparation in human assisted medical procreation: effects on viability, motility and mitochondrial membrane potential

Abstract: Background: Externalization of phosphatidylserine (EPS) occurs in apoptotic-like spermatozoa and could be used to remove them from sperm preparations to enhance sperm quality for assisted medical procreation. We first characterized EPS in sperms from infertile patients in terms of frequency of EPS spermatozoa as well as localization of phosphatidylserine (PS) on spermatozoa. Subsequently, we determined the impact of depleting EPS spermatozoa on sperm quality.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

8
76
2

Year Published

2012
2012
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 100 publications
(86 citation statements)
references
References 86 publications
8
76
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This finding contrasts with the results obtained for human semen, where a higher level of morphologically normal spermatozoa is observed in unbound fractions compared to control samples after MACS separation Said et al 2006;Aziz et al 2007). In other studies, however, human spermatozoa were not evaluated according to their morphology (De Vantery Arrighi et al 2009;Lee et al 2010) and no information on morphological changes is available for rabbit spermatozoa following MACS (Vasicek et al 2011). The majority of authors report an increase of human sperm motility in unbound fractions after MACS separation (De Vantery Arrigi et al 2009;Rawe et al 2010).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 55%
“…This finding contrasts with the results obtained for human semen, where a higher level of morphologically normal spermatozoa is observed in unbound fractions compared to control samples after MACS separation Said et al 2006;Aziz et al 2007). In other studies, however, human spermatozoa were not evaluated according to their morphology (De Vantery Arrighi et al 2009;Lee et al 2010) and no information on morphological changes is available for rabbit spermatozoa following MACS (Vasicek et al 2011). The majority of authors report an increase of human sperm motility in unbound fractions after MACS separation (De Vantery Arrigi et al 2009;Rawe et al 2010).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 55%
“…MACS efficiently reduces sperm DNA fragmentation levels [13,19,29,30,40,47,48] and effectively separates apoptotic from non-apoptotic spermatozoa [6, 8, 11, 14, 17-20, 28, 29, 34, 37-39, 44]. This selection leads to an improvement in sperm quality and functionality [14,19,23] because MACS positively affects sperm motility [5,8,29,34,38,41] and morphology as determined by the sperm deformity index [2-4, 38, 39, 41]. Several authors reported an improvement in fertilization rates [12,36] and embryo quality [1,9,40] because the best sperms were selected using MACS compared with standard selection methods.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They suggested that not all species are suitable for MACS separation method. In our knowledge, most of the research for MACS separation or the combination of DGC and MACS used human samples (de Vantéry Arrighi, Lucas, Chardonnens, & De Agostini, 2009;Gil, Shalom, Sivira, Carreras, & Checa, 2013;Martin et al, 2017;Romany et al, 2017). DGC has been proven to effectively remove nonviable spermatozoa.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%