The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
1985
DOI: 10.1085/jgp.86.2.289
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Removal of sodium channel inactivation in squid axon by the oxidant chloramine-T.

Abstract: We have investigated the effects of a mild oxidant, chloramine-T (CT), on the sodium and potassium currents of squid axons under voltageclamp conditions. Sodium channel inactivation of squid giant axons can be completely removed by CT at neutral pH. Internal and external CT treatment are both effective. CT apparently removes inactivation in an irreversible, allor-none manner . The activation process of sodium channels is little affected, as judged from the voltage dependence of peak sodium currents, the rising… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
42
1

Year Published

1988
1988
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
3
42
1
Order By: Relevance
“…When 3.6 mM chloramine-T was included in the external solution the sodium currents were prolonged, indicating a removal of sodium inactivation as reported by Wang et al (1985). Concomitantly the birefringence traces were altered, the slow phases were removed and the rapid phases at the beginning and the end of the pulse became the same size (Fig.…”
Section: Chloramine-t Removes the Slow Phasesupporting
confidence: 61%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…When 3.6 mM chloramine-T was included in the external solution the sodium currents were prolonged, indicating a removal of sodium inactivation as reported by Wang et al (1985). Concomitantly the birefringence traces were altered, the slow phases were removed and the rapid phases at the beginning and the end of the pulse became the same size (Fig.…”
Section: Chloramine-t Removes the Slow Phasesupporting
confidence: 61%
“…This paper presents more kinetic data on the slow birefringence responses and examines the effects of chloramine-T, a mild oxidant, which prolongs sodium currents (Wang, Brodwick & Eaton, 1985) and prevents immobilization of gating charge (Tanguy & Yeh, 1988). Two other agents which modify sodium currents and gating currents have been tested for effects on the birefringence change.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ChT is an oxidizing agent that preferentially oxidizes methionine to methionine sulfoxide (MetO) but it can also oxidize cysteine. Selective oxidation of methionine to MetO by ChT (< 10 mM) has been demonstrated in different proteins [33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40]. Particularly in other ion channels, ChT does indeed act as a Met-preferring oxidizing agent as demonstrated by using electrophysiology and site-directed mutagenesis [20,23].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In view of reports that sodium channel inactivation can be modified by chemical reagents applied to the external membrane surface (Nonner et al 1980;Wang et al 1985), we examined the effects of SITS and NBA applied to the outside of GH3 cells using the U-tube apparatus. As opposed to the effects seen with internal application (Fig.…”
Section: External Chemical Modification Of K+ Channel Inactivationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our present concepts regarding the molecular mechanisms of inactivation gating in Na+ channels have arisen not only from detailed biophysical analysis of behaviours at the single-and multichannel level, but also from attempts to selectively modify these behaviours with group-specific chemical reagents and enzymes. Clues concerning the membrane orientation and nature of reactive residues involved in inactivation have resulted from this approach (Oxford, Wu & Narahashi, 1978;Eaton, Brodwick, Oxford & Rudy, 1978;Nonner, Spaulding & Hille, 1980;Brodwick & Eaton, 1982;Wang, Brodwick & Eaton, 1985;Rack, Rubly & Waschow, 1986;Gonoi & Hille, 1987). Modification of inactivation by these agents has also been manifest at the single-channel level and has aided in discrimination of gating models (Patlak & Horn, 1982).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%