1992
DOI: 10.1055/s-2008-1057139
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Removal of Selected Infralabyrinthine Lesions Without Facial Nerve Mobilization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The TM-IL approach, as performed in our hands, is a compilation of different surgical steps developed by our own experience together with the experience of others. [4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11] Complete tumor removal was achieved in 84% of patients after TM-IL and in 73% after IFT-A. This can be explained by the fact that the IFT-A approach was applied to patients with more extensive disease-C3 tumors with significant carotid artery involvement (45% compared with 32% in TM-IL) and intradural tumor spread (18% compared with 8% in TM-IL).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The TM-IL approach, as performed in our hands, is a compilation of different surgical steps developed by our own experience together with the experience of others. [4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11] Complete tumor removal was achieved in 84% of patients after TM-IL and in 73% after IFT-A. This can be explained by the fact that the IFT-A approach was applied to patients with more extensive disease-C3 tumors with significant carotid artery involvement (45% compared with 32% in TM-IL) and intradural tumor spread (18% compared with 8% in TM-IL).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2,3 Problems experienced by others using this technique resulted in alternative solutions to avoid anterior transposition. [4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11] With these techniques, 70 to 95% of patients retained normal postoperative facial function. 6,[11][12][13][14][15] However, the FN function is just one of the important aspects of jugular PGL surgery.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[25][26][27] However, the literature search identified only a few articles describing small case series that used this approach for jugular paragangliomas. [25][26][27] However, the literature search identified only a few articles describing small case series that used this approach for jugular paragangliomas.…”
Section: Non-rerouting Techniquementioning
confidence: 99%
“…As originally described, the approach used either an intact canal wall technique or canal wall down mastoidectomy. 1 Maniglia et al 2 described the same operation but called it the inferior mastoidectomy-hypotympanic approach. Later, Pensak and Jackler 3 used the term fallopian bridge technique for selected jugular foramen tumors.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3,4 With this technique, good facial nerve outcomes have been reported in patients with jugular foramen lesions. 1,3 However, because the mastoid segment of the facial nerve occupies the center of the operative field, most accept that it obstructs the surgical view to some extent and, as a consequence, makes tumor dissection difficult. The aim of this study was to analyze the surgical exposure of the jugular foramen afforded by the fallopian bridge technique.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%