2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2011.11.032
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Removal of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons from soil: A comparison between bioremoval and supercritical fluids extraction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
22
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
1
22
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…To date, bioaugmentation and biostimulation are widely known technologies to remediate hydrocarbon-polluted sites (Amezcua-Allieri et al, 2012), whereby the addition of nutrients or microorganisms is required. Recently, in situ remediation of contaminated soils has received considerable attention due to its many advantages such as low cost and the avoidance of secondary pollution (Huang et al, 2011;Rulkens, 2005).…”
Section: Total Organic Carbon (Toc)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To date, bioaugmentation and biostimulation are widely known technologies to remediate hydrocarbon-polluted sites (Amezcua-Allieri et al, 2012), whereby the addition of nutrients or microorganisms is required. Recently, in situ remediation of contaminated soils has received considerable attention due to its many advantages such as low cost and the avoidance of secondary pollution (Huang et al, 2011;Rulkens, 2005).…”
Section: Total Organic Carbon (Toc)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Biostimulation & bioaugmentations are widely known technologies to remediate hydrocarbons-polluted sites (Amezcua-Allieri et al, 2003, 2012Singer et al, 2005). Biodegradation is occurred by breaking down of PAHs using microorganisms, either in the presence of oxygen (i.e., aerobic condition) or without oxygen (i.e., anaerobic condition).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…8 In Brazil, the Sao Paulo state environmental company (CETESB) reported approximately 2900 contaminated areas in the state, of which 80% correspond to contamination by gas stations. [11][12][13] The contaminants removed aer a remediation process by SFE are easily destroyed by different methods, including incineration and chemical oxidation. However, the difficulty in nding appropriate forms of treatment is a current topic, especially when an in situ treatment is required, since the transport and storage of contaminated soils may increase the remediation process costs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Microorganisms remove PAHs from soil and even complex compounds, such as anthracene with three benzene rings, are dissipated within weeks (Amezcua-Allieri et al 2012). Numerous bacteria have been described that can degrade PAHs, such as phylotypes belonging to the genus Sphingomonas (Zhang et al 2011a), so they will be favoured (Jones et al 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%